Carville S F, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bliddal H, Blotman F, Branco J C, Buskila D, Da Silva J A P, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Dincer F, Henriksson C, Henriksson K G, Kosek E, Longley K, McCarthy G M, Perrot S, Puszczewicz M, Sarzi-Puttini P, Silman A, Späth M, Choy E H
Academic Rheumatology Unit, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Apr;67(4):536-41. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.071522. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
To develop evidence-based recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia syndrome.
A multidisciplinary task force was formed representing 11 European countries. The design of the study, including search strategy, participants, interventions, outcome measures, data collection and analytical method, was defined at the outset. A systematic review was undertaken with the keywords "fibromyalgia", "treatment or management" and "trial". Studies were excluded if they did not utilise the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria, were not clinical trials, or included patients with chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis. Primary outcome measures were change in pain assessed by visual analogue scale and fibromyalgia impact questionnaire. The quality of the studies was categorised based on randomisation, blinding and allocation concealment. Only the highest quality studies were used to base recommendations on. When there was insufficient evidence from the literature, a Delphi process was used to provide basis for recommendation.
146 studies were eligible for the review. 39 pharmacological intervention studies and 59 non-pharmacological were included in the final recommendation summary tables once those of a lower quality or with insufficient data were separated. The categories of treatment identified were antidepressants, analgesics, and "other pharmacological" and exercise, cognitive behavioural therapy, education, dietary interventions and "other non-pharmacological". In many studies sample size was small and the quality of the study was insufficient for strong recommendations to be made.
Nine recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia syndrome were developed using a systematic review and expert consensus.
制定基于证据的纤维肌痛综合征管理建议。
成立了一个代表11个欧洲国家的多学科特别工作组。研究设计,包括检索策略、参与者、干预措施、结局指标、数据收集和分析方法,在一开始就确定了。采用关键词“纤维肌痛”、“治疗或管理”和“试验”进行系统评价。如果研究未采用美国风湿病学会分类标准、不是临床试验,或纳入了慢性疲劳综合征或肌痛性脑脊髓炎患者,则将其排除。主要结局指标是通过视觉模拟量表和纤维肌痛影响问卷评估的疼痛变化。根据随机化、盲法和分配隐藏对研究质量进行分类。仅使用最高质量的研究作为推荐的依据。当文献证据不足时,采用德尔菲法为推荐提供依据。
146项研究符合综述标准。在排除质量较低或数据不足的研究后,最终推荐汇总表中纳入了39项药物干预研究和59项非药物干预研究。确定的治疗类别为抗抑郁药、镇痛药、“其他药物”以及运动、认知行为疗法、教育、饮食干预和“其他非药物”。在许多研究中,样本量较小,研究质量不足以做出强有力的推荐。
通过系统评价和专家共识,制定了九条纤维肌痛综合征管理建议。