• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解CAHPS赞助商的报告做法。

Understanding the reporting practices of CAHPS sponsors.

作者信息

Teleki Stephanie S, Kanouse David E, Elliott Marc N, Hiatt Liisa, de Vries Han, Quigley Denise D

机构信息

RAND Health and Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):17-30.

PMID:17645153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4194987/
Abstract

This article examines the reporting of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPSO) consumer experience data by sponsors, those that fund data collection and decide how information is summarized and disseminated. We found that sponsors typically publicly reported comparative data to consumers, employers, and/or purchasers. They presented health plan-level data in print and online at least annually, usually in combination with non-CAHPS information. Many provided trend data, comparisons to individual plans, and summary scores. Most shared information consistent with known successful reporting practices. Areas meriting attention include: tailoring reports to specific audiences, assessing literacy, planning dissemination, educating vendors, and evaluating products and programs.

摘要

本文探讨了医疗服务提供者与系统消费者评估(CAHPSO)消费者体验数据的报告情况,报告者是那些资助数据收集并决定如何汇总和传播信息的主办方。我们发现,主办方通常会向消费者、雇主和/或购买者公开报告比较数据。他们至少每年以印刷品和在线形式呈现健康计划层面的数据,通常还会结合非CAHPS信息。许多主办方提供趋势数据、与个别计划的比较以及汇总分数。大多数主办方分享的信息符合已知的成功报告做法。值得关注的领域包括:针对特定受众定制报告、评估文化水平、规划传播、培训供应商以及评估产品和项目。

相似文献

1
Understanding the reporting practices of CAHPS sponsors.了解CAHPS赞助商的报告做法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):17-30.
2
Private sector unlikely to follow Medicare lead in providing health plan disenrollment comparisons.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Mar;28(3):115-26. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28011-6.
3
Special issues in assessing care of Medicaid recipients.评估医疗补助受助人护理情况的特殊问题。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS79-88. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00009.
4
Psychometric properties of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 2.0 adult core survey.消费者健康计划评估研究(CAHPS)2.0成人核心调查问卷的心理测量特性。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 1):1509-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00190.x.
5
Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.CAHPS 1.0调查指标的心理测量特性。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS22-31. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00003.
6
Making survey results easy to report to consumers: how reporting needs guided survey design in CAHPS. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.让调查结果易于向消费者报告:报告需求如何指导“医疗保健计划消费者评估(CAHPS)”中的调查设计。医疗保健计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS32-40. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00004.
7
Epilogue: Early lessons from CAHPS Demonstrations and Evaluations. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.结语:CAHPS示范与评估的早期经验教训。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS97-105.
8
Special issues addressed in the CAHPS survey of Medicare managed care beneficiaries. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.医疗保险管理式医疗受益人的CAHPS调查中涉及的特殊问题。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS69-78. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00008.
9
Similarities and differences in choosing health plans.选择健康保险计划的异同。
Med Care. 2002 Apr;40(4):289-302. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200204000-00005.
10
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 1.0 Core Survey.医疗计划消费者评估研究(CAHPS)1.0核心调查问卷的验证性因素分析。
Psychol Assess. 2001 Jun;13(2):216-29. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.13.2.216.

本文引用的文献

1
Overview, History, and Objectives of Performance Measurement.绩效评估的概述、历史与目标
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):7-21.
2
Evidence of Innovative Uses of Performance Measures Among Purchasers.购买方对绩效指标创新应用的证据。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Spring;22(3):35-47.
3
Imaging studies for low back pain.腰痛的影像学检查
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1080/15360280802537332.
4
Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.医院质量改进中的公开报告与绩效薪酬
N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):486-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa064964. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
5
Using public reports of patient satisfaction for hospital quality improvement.利用患者满意度公开报告促进医院质量改进。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun;41(3 Pt 1):663-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00508.x.
6
Measuring hospital care from the patients' perspective: an overview of the CAHPS Hospital Survey development process.从患者角度衡量医院护理:CAHPS医院调查开发过程概述。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec;40(6 Pt 2):1977-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00477.x.
7
Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation.医院绩效报告:对质量、市场份额和声誉的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):1150-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1150.
8
Reporting about health care quality: a guide to the galaxy.
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Jul;5(3):222-31. doi: 10.1177/1524839904264511.
9
Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts?公布医院绩效是否会刺激质量改进工作?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):84-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.84.
10
Health plan quality-of-care information is undermined by voluntary reporting.自愿报告削弱了医疗计划的医疗质量信息。
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Jan;24(1):62-70. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00569-x.