Suppr超能文献

选择健康保险计划的异同。

Similarities and differences in choosing health plans.

作者信息

Farley Short Pamela, McCormack Lauren, Hibbard Judith, Shaul James A, Harris-Kojetin Lauren, Fox Michael H, Damiano Peter, Uhrig Jennifer D, Cleary Paul D

机构信息

Pennsylvania State University, 116 Henderson Building, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2002 Apr;40(4):289-302. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200204000-00005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, consumers have multiple health insurance options. New information is being developed to help consumers with these choices.

OBJECTIVES

To study similarities and differences in how the publicly and privately insured choose health plans. To explore the effect of traditional enrollment materials and reports developed by the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) on consumers' perceptions and decision-making.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Using data from eight CAHPS demonstrations, we tested for significant differences across consumers with employer-sponsored insurance, Medicaid, and Medicare.

SUBJECTS

Approximately 10,000 consumers with employer-sponsored, Medicaid, and Medicare health plans.

MEASURES

Perceptions of the health plan selection process, use of information sources, and reactions to and use of traditional enrollment materials and CAHPS reports.

RESULTS

Most consumers with all types of insurance thought that choosing a health plan was important and obtained information from multiple sources. Choosing a plan was more difficult for Medicare and Medicaid recipients than for the privately insured. When choosing a plan, Medicaid recipients cared most about convenience and access, whereas the privately insured emphasized providers and costs. The percentage of consumers who looked at and remembered the CAHPS report varied widely from 24% to 77%. In all but one of the demonstration sites, most consumers spent less than 30 minutes looking at the CAHPS report.

CONCLUSIONS

Group sponsors and the developers of information interventions such as CAHPS may need to invest in developing and testing different reporting approaches for Medicare, Medicaid, and privately insured consumers.

摘要

背景

消费者拥有多种健康保险选择的情况日益增多。正在开发新的信息以帮助消费者做出这些选择。

目的

研究公共保险和私人保险的参保者在选择健康计划方式上的异同。探讨由健康计划消费者评估研究(CAHPS)编制的传统参保材料和报告对消费者认知及决策的影响。

研究设计

利用八项CAHPS示范项目的数据,我们对参加雇主赞助保险、医疗补助和医疗保险的消费者之间的显著差异进行了测试。

研究对象

约10000名参加雇主赞助、医疗补助和医疗保险健康计划的消费者。

测量指标

对健康计划选择过程的认知、信息来源的使用,以及对传统参保材料和CAHPS报告的反应及使用情况。

结果

大多数各类保险的消费者都认为选择健康计划很重要,并从多个来源获取信息。医疗保险和医疗补助领取者选择计划比私人保险参保者更困难。选择计划时,医疗补助领取者最关心便利性和可及性,而私人保险参保者则强调医疗服务提供者和成本。查看并记住CAHPS报告的消费者比例差异很大,从24%到77%不等。在除一个示范地点外的所有地点,大多数消费者查看CAHPS报告的时间不到30分钟。

结论

团体赞助商以及CAHPS等信息干预措施的开发者可能需要投入精力,为医疗保险、医疗补助和私人保险消费者开发和测试不同的报告方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验