Nasir Khurram, Budoff Matthew J, Wong Nathan D, Scheuner Maren, Herrington David, Arnett Donna K, Szklo Moyses, Greenland Philip, Blumenthal Roger S
Cardiac MRI PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Circulation. 2007 Aug 7;116(6):619-26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.688739. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
A family history of premature coronary heart disease (CHD) is a known risk factor for CHD events. The purpose of this study was to assess the strength of the association between a family history of premature CHD and coronary artery calcification (CAC) in a multiethnic cohort of asymptomatic individuals. We also sought to determine whether individuals with a reported family history of premature CHD have an increased atherosclerotic burden among those classified as being at low to intermediate risk on the basis of the conventional Framingham risk score.
The association of family history of premature CHD with CAC was assessed in 5347 asymptomatic individuals (47% men; mean age 62+/-10 years) in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). The demographics (age, gender, and race)-adjusted OR for CAC > 0 with versus without a family history of premature CHD was 1.94 (95% CI, 1.64 to 2.29). On adjustment for CHD risk factors, the association was slightly attenuated to an OR of 1.84 (95% CI, 1.55 to 2.19). Family history of premature CHD was significantly associated with CAC in all ethnic groups. The age-, gender-, and race-adjusted prevalence of CAC > 0 was significantly higher with presence of any family history of premature CHD than for those with no family history of premature CHD among individuals classified as low risk (35% versus 23%, P<0.0001) and among those at intermediate risk (70% versus 60%, P=0.01). Similarly, the prevalence of age-gender-race-based CAC > or = 75th percentile in low-risk (24% versus 14%, P=0.0003) and intermediate-risk (34% versus 20%, P<0.001) individuals was also higher among those with a family history of premature CHD. Compared with those without a family history of premature CHD, the association with the presence of CAC was strongest in participants reporting such history in both a parent and a sibling (odds ratio, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.64 to 4.59), followed by those reporting a family history in a sibling only (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.64 to 2.58) and those reporting a family history of premature CHD only in a parent (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.93).
An association between family history of premature CHD and the presence of any CAC, as well as advanced CAC, was observed in the present population-based multiethnic study. The relationship was independent of other risk factors and Framingham risk score, which supports the utility of including information on family history of premature CHD in current methods of global risk assessment and practice guidelines.
早发冠心病(CHD)家族史是已知的冠心病事件风险因素。本研究的目的是在一个多民族无症状个体队列中评估早发冠心病家族史与冠状动脉钙化(CAC)之间关联的强度。我们还试图确定,在根据传统弗明汉风险评分被归类为低至中度风险的人群中,报告有早发冠心病家族史的个体是否具有更高的动脉粥样硬化负担。
在动脉粥样硬化多民族研究(MESA)中,对5347名无症状个体(47%为男性;平均年龄62±10岁)评估早发冠心病家族史与CAC的关联。有早发冠心病家族史与无早发冠心病家族史相比,经人口统计学因素(年龄、性别和种族)调整后,CAC>0的优势比为1.94(95%CI,1.64至2.29)。在对冠心病风险因素进行调整后,该关联略有减弱,优势比为1.84(95%CI,1.55至2.19)。早发冠心病家族史在所有种族群体中均与CAC显著相关。在被归类为低风险的个体中,有任何早发冠心病家族史者CAC>0的年龄、性别和种族调整患病率显著高于无早发冠心病家族史者(35%对23%,P<0.0001);在中度风险个体中也是如此(70%对60%,P=0.01)。同样,在低风险(24%对14%,P=0.0003)和中度风险(34%对20%,P<0.001)个体中,有早发冠心病家族史者基于年龄、性别和种族的CAC>或=第75百分位数的患病率也更高。与无早发冠心病家族史者相比,在父母和兄弟姐妹中均报告有此类家族史的参与者中,与CAC存在的关联最强(优势比,2.74;95%CI,1.64至4.59),其次是仅在兄弟姐妹中报告有家族史者(优势比,2.06;95%CI,1.64至2.58),以及仅在父母中报告有早发冠心病家族史者(优势比,1.52;95%CI,1.19至1.93)。
在本基于人群的多民族研究中,观察到早发冠心病家族史与任何CAC以及严重CAC的存在之间存在关联。这种关系独立于其他风险因素和弗明汉风险评分,这支持在当前全球风险评估方法和实践指南中纳入早发冠心病家族史信息的实用性。