• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of Combining Coronary Calcium Score With Treatment on Plaque Progression in Familial Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.冠状动脉钙化评分联合治疗对家族性冠状动脉疾病斑块进展的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Apr 22;333(16):1403-1412. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.0584.
2
CTA-Derived Plaque Characteristics and Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Coronary Artery Calcium Score of Zero: Insights From the ICONIC Trial.冠状动脉钙化积分为零的患者中CTA衍生的斑块特征与急性冠状动脉综合征风险:来自ICONIC试验的见解
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2025 Jul 23:1-11. doi: 10.2214/AJR.24.31476.
3
Effects of Pitavastatin on Coronary Artery Disease and Inflammatory Biomarkers in HIV: Mechanistic Substudy of the REPRIEVE Randomized Clinical Trial.吡咯烷二硫代氨基甲酸盐对 HIV 患者冠心病及炎症生物标志物的影响:REPRIEVE 随机临床试验的机制亚研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Apr 1;9(4):323-334. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.5661.
4
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computed tomography screening for coronary artery disease: systematic review.计算机断层扫描筛查冠心病的有效性和成本效益:系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Oct;10(39):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-41. doi: 10.3310/hta10390.
5
Prognostic value of plaque burden assessed by coronary CT angiography in known coronary artery disease.冠状动脉CT血管造影评估的斑块负荷在已知冠状动脉疾病中的预后价值。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2025.05.239.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Polygenic Risk Is Associated With Long-Term Coronary Plaque Progression and High-Risk Plaque.多基因风险与长期冠状动脉斑块进展及高危斑块相关。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Dec;17(12):1445-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.06.015. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
8
Risk factors that predict for presence of clinically significant, noncalcified plaque in younger adults.预测年轻成年人中具有临床意义的非钙化斑块存在的风险因素。
Coron Artery Dis. 2025 Aug 1;36(5):416-421. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001495. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
9
Coronary Artery Calcium Density and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉钙化密度与心血管事件风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Mar;18(3):294-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.07.024. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
10
Association Between Lipoprotein(a) and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and High-Risk Plaque: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.载脂蛋白(a)与阻塞性冠状动脉疾病和高危斑块的相关性:来自 PROMISE 试验的见解。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Nov 15;231:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.09.006. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Lung Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: Common Pathophysiology and Treatment-Emergent Toxicity.肺癌与心血管疾病:共同的病理生理学与治疗——新发毒性
JACC CardioOncol. 2025 Jun;7(4):325-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2025.05.003.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventive percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy alone for the treatment of vulnerable atherosclerotic coronary plaques (PREVENT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.预防性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与单纯最佳药物治疗治疗易损动脉粥样硬化性冠状动脉斑块(PREVENT):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2024 May 4;403(10438):1753-1765. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00413-6. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
2
Effects of Pitavastatin on Coronary Artery Disease and Inflammatory Biomarkers in HIV: Mechanistic Substudy of the REPRIEVE Randomized Clinical Trial.吡咯烷二硫代氨基甲酸盐对 HIV 患者冠心病及炎症生物标志物的影响:REPRIEVE 随机临床试验的机制亚研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Apr 1;9(4):323-334. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.5661.
3
Pitavastatin to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease in HIV Infection.匹伐他汀预防 HIV 感染患者的心血管疾病。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 24;389(8):687-699. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304146. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
4
Impact of Patient Visualization of Cardiovascular Images on Modification of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.患者观看心血管图像对心血管危险因素改变的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Aug;16(8):1069-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Major Global Coronary Artery Calcium Guidelines.主要全球冠状动脉钙化指南。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Jan;16(1):98-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.06.018. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
6
Evaluation of the Incremental Value of a Coronary Artery Calcium Score Beyond Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估冠状动脉钙评分对传统心血管风险评估的增量价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jun 1;182(6):634-642. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1262.
7
Association of Statin Treatment With Progression of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition.他汀类药物治疗与冠状动脉粥样硬化斑块成分进展的关系。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Nov 1;6(11):1257-1266. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3055.
8
The National Lipid Association scientific statement on coronary artery calcium scoring to guide preventive strategies for ASCVD risk reduction.美国国家脂质协会关于冠状动脉钙评分指导 ASCVD 风险降低的预防策略的科学声明。
J Clin Lipidol. 2021 Jan-Feb;15(1):33-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.12.005. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
9
2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2019美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管疾病一级预防指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2019 Sep 10;140(11):e596-e646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
10
Impact of Statins on Cardiovascular Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.他汀类药物对冠状动脉钙评分后心血管结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 25;72(25):3233-3242. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.051.

冠状动脉钙化评分联合治疗对家族性冠状动脉疾病斑块进展的影响:一项随机临床试验

Effects of Combining Coronary Calcium Score With Treatment on Plaque Progression in Familial Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Nerlekar Nitesh, Vasanthakumar Sheran A, Whitmore Kristyn, Soh Cheng Hwee, Chan Jasmine, Goel Vinay, Ryan Jacqueline, Jones Catherine, Stanton Tony, Mitchell Geoffrey, Tonkin Andrew, Watts Gerald F, Nicholls Stephen J, Marwick Thomas H

机构信息

Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Victorian Heart Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA. 2025 Apr 22;333(16):1403-1412. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.0584.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2025.0584
PMID:40042839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11883595/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring provides prognostic information, especially in patients at intermediate risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the benefit of combining CAC score with a primary prevention strategy has not been tested in a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether combining the CAC score with a prevention strategy can be used to limit plaque progression in intermediate-risk patients with a family history of premature CAD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, randomized, open-blinded end point clinical trial in 7 hospitals across Australia (between 2013 and 2020; the last date of follow-up was June 5, 2021). Asymptomatic people aged 40 to 70 years with a first-degree relative with CAD onset at younger than 60 years old or second-degree relative with onset at younger than 50 years old were recruited from the community.

INTERVENTIONS

Intermediate-risk participants underwent CAC scoring. Those with a CAC score greater than 0 but less than 400 underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and were randomized to CAC score-informed prevention or usual care.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Follow-up CCTA was obtained at 3 years, with plaque volume measured by an independent core laboratory. The primary outcome was total plaque volume, with further analysis for calcified and noncalcified plaque volume.

RESULTS

This study included 365 participants (mean [SD] age, 58 [6] years; 57.5% male); 179 in the CAC score-informed and 186 in the usual care groups. Compared with usual care, the CAC score-informed group showed a sustained reduction in total (mean [SD], -3 [31] mg/dL vs -56 [38] mg/dL; P < .001) and LDL (mean [SD], -2 [31] vs -51 [36] mg/dL; P < .001) cholesterol levels at 3 years, which was associated with a reduction in pooled cohort equation risk calculation (mean [SD], 2.1% [2.9%] vs 0.5% [2.9%]; P < .001). Plaque progression was greater in usual care than CAC score-informed participants for total plaque volume (mean [SD], 24.9 [37.7] mm3 vs 15.4 [30.9] mm3; P = .009), noncalcified plaque volume (mean [SD], 15.7 [32.2] mm3 vs 5.6 [28.5] mm3; P = .002), and fibrofatty and necrotic core plaque volume (mean [SD], 4.5 [25.8] mm3 vs -0.8 [12.6] mm3; P = .02). These plaque volume changes were independent of other risk factors including baseline plaque volume, blood pressure, and lipid profile.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The combination of CAC score with a primary prevention strategy in intermediate-risk patients with a family history of CAD was associated with reduction of atherogenic lipids and slower plaque progression compared with usual care. These data support the use of CAC score to assist intensive preventive strategies in intermediate-risk patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12614001294640.

摘要

重要性

冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分可提供预后信息,尤其是在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)中度风险患者中。然而,将CAC评分与一级预防策略相结合的益处尚未在随机试验中得到验证。

目的

评估将CAC评分与预防策略相结合是否可用于限制有早发CAD家族史的中度风险患者的斑块进展。

设计、地点和参与者:在澳大利亚7家医院进行的前瞻性、随机、开放盲法终点临床试验(2013年至2020年期间;最后随访日期为2021年6月5日)。从社区招募年龄在40至70岁之间、有CAD发病年龄小于60岁的一级亲属或发病年龄小于50岁的二级亲属的无症状人群。

干预措施

中度风险参与者接受CAC评分。CAC评分大于0但小于400的参与者接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA),并随机分为基于CAC评分的预防组或常规治疗组。

主要结局和测量指标

在3年时进行随访CCTA,由独立核心实验室测量斑块体积。主要结局是总斑块体积,并对钙化和非钙化斑块体积进行进一步分析。

结果

本研究纳入365名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,58[6]岁;57.5%为男性);基于CAC评分的预防组179名,常规治疗组186名。与常规治疗相比,基于CAC评分的预防组在3年时总胆固醇(平均[标准差],-3[31]mg/dL对-56[38]mg/dL;P<.001)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(平均[标准差],-2[31]对-51[36]mg/dL;P<.001)水平持续降低,这与汇总队列方程风险计算的降低相关(平均[标准差],2.1%[2.9%]对0.5%[2.9%];P<.001)。常规治疗组的斑块进展在总斑块体积(平均[标准差],24.9[37.7]mm³对15.4[30.9]mm³;P=.009)、非钙化斑块体积(平均[标准差],15.7[32.2]mm³对5.6[28.5]mm³;P=.002)以及纤维脂肪和坏死核心斑块体积(平均[标准差],4.5[25.8]mm³对-0.8[12.6]mm³;P=.02)方面均大于基于CAC评分的预防组参与者。这些斑块体积变化独立于其他风险因素,包括基线斑块体积、血压和血脂谱。

结论和相关性

与常规治疗相比,在有CAD家族史的中度风险患者中,将CAC评分与一级预防策略相结合与致动脉粥样硬化脂质的降低和斑块进展减缓相关。这些数据支持使用CAC评分来辅助中度风险患者的强化预防策略。

试验注册

anzctr.org.au标识符:ACTRN12614001294640。