MacCarthy Thomas, Bergman Aviv
Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 31;104(31):12801-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705455104. Epub 2007 Jul 23.
The prevalence of sexual reproduction remains one of the most perplexing phenomena in evolutionary biology. The deterministic mutation hypothesis postulates that sexual reproduction will be advantageous under synergistic epistasis, a condition in which mutations cause a greater reduction in fitness when combined than would be expected from their individual effects. The inverse condition, antagonistic epistasis, correspondingly is predicted to favor asexual reproduction. To assess this hypothesis, we introduce a finite population evolutionary process that combines a recombination modifier formalism with a gene-regulatory network model. We demonstrate that when reproductive mode and epistasis are allowed to coevolve, asexual reproduction outcompetes sexual reproduction. In addition, no correlation is found between the level of synergistic epistasis and the fixation time of the asexual mode. However, a significant correlation is found between the level of antagonistic epistasis and asexual mode fixation time. This asymmetry can be explained by the greater reduction in fitness imposed by sexual reproduction as compared with asexual reproduction. Our findings present evidence and suggest plausible explanations that challenge both the deterministic mutation hypothesis and recent arguments asserting the importance of emergent synergistic epistasis in the maintenance of sexual reproduction.
有性生殖的普遍性仍然是进化生物学中最令人费解的现象之一。确定性突变假说假定,在协同上位性的情况下,有性生殖将具有优势,协同上位性是指突变组合时导致的适合度降低幅度大于其单独作用预期的情况。相反的情况,即拮抗性上位性,则相应地被预测有利于无性生殖。为了评估这一假说,我们引入了一个有限种群进化过程,该过程将重组修饰形式与基因调控网络模型相结合。我们证明,当生殖模式和上位性能够共同进化时,无性生殖会胜过有性生殖。此外,协同上位性水平与无性生殖模式的固定时间之间没有相关性。然而,拮抗性上位性水平与无性生殖模式固定时间之间存在显著相关性。这种不对称可以通过有性生殖相比无性生殖对适合度造成的更大降低来解释。我们的研究结果提供了证据,并提出了合理的解释,对确定性突变假说以及最近声称新兴协同上位性在维持有性生殖中具有重要性的观点都提出了挑战。