Suppr超能文献

两项研究的故事;伦理、生物恐怖主义与科学审查

A tale of two studies; ethics, bioterrorism, and the censorship of science.

作者信息

Selgelid Michael J

机构信息

Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Australian National University.

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 May-Jun;37(3):35-43. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2007.0046.

Abstract

Some scientific research should not be published. The risks to national security and public health override the social benefits of disseminating scientific results openly. Unfortunately, scientists themselves are not in a position to know which studies to withhold from public view, as the National Research Council has proposed. Yet neither can government alone be trusted to balance the competing interests at stake.

摘要

一些科学研究不应被发表。对国家安全和公众健康的风险超过了公开传播科学成果的社会效益。不幸的是,正如美国国家研究委员会所提议的那样,科学家自身无法确定哪些研究应向公众隐瞒。然而,仅靠政府也无法被信任去平衡相互冲突的利益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验