Oltmann Shannon
School of Library & Information Science, University of Kentucky, 320 Lucille Little Fine Arts Libraryô, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA,
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Apr;21(2):327-41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9535-y. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
Most recent studies of dual use research have focused on the life sciences, although some researchers have suggested that dual use research occurs across many disciplines. This research is an initial investigation into the prevalence of dual use research in other scientific disciplines by surveying senior editors of scientific journals, drawn from Journal Citation Reports. The survey was emailed to 7,500 journal editors with a response rate of 10.1 %. Approximately 4.8 % of life science editors reported they had to consider whether to publish dual use research and 38.9 % said they decided to not publish the research in question. In disciplines other than the life sciences, 7.2 % of editors from other science disciplines reported that they had to consider whether to publish dual use research, and 48.4 % declined to publish it. The survey investigated relationships between dual use and the journal's source of funding and place of publication, but no relationships were found. Further research is needed to better understand the occurrence of dual use research in other science disciplines.
尽管一些研究人员认为两用研究存在于许多学科中,但最近关于两用研究的研究主要集中在生命科学领域。本研究通过对科学期刊高级编辑进行调查,对其他科学学科中两用研究的普遍性进行了初步调查,这些编辑来自《期刊引证报告》。该调查以电子邮件形式发送给7500名期刊编辑,回复率为10.1%。约4.8%的生命科学编辑报告称,他们必须考虑是否发表两用研究,38.9%的编辑表示决定不发表相关研究。在生命科学以外的学科中,7.2%的其他科学学科编辑报告称,他们必须考虑是否发表两用研究,48.4%的编辑拒绝发表。该调查研究了两用研究与期刊资金来源和出版地之间的关系,但未发现任何关联。需要进一步开展研究,以更好地了解其他科学学科中两用研究的发生情况。