Suppr超能文献

能力验证计划、实验室内部质量监测以及食品常规执法检查中的测量不确定度评估。

Estimates of measurement uncertainty from proficiency testing schemes, internal laboratory quality monitoring and during routine enforcement examination of foods.

作者信息

Jarvis B, Corry J E L, Hedges A J

机构信息

Ross Biosciences Ltd, Upton Bishop, Ross-on-Wye, UK.

出版信息

J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Aug;103(2):462-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03258.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine the levels of measurement uncertainty (MU) obtained in proficiency testing and routine microbiological analyses of foods and to compare these with estimates of MU obtained for results of analyses obtained in collaborative interlaboratory studies of microbiological methods.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Raw data submitted by participants in the Food Examination Proficiency Assessment Scheme were obtained from the Central Science Laboratory (York). Internal quality monitoring data were obtained from Health Protection Agency (HPA) laboratories, together with data from routine food examinations undertaken in HPA laboratories. The data sets were analysed to determine the relative standard deviations of reproducibility (RSD(R)), based on log(10) colony count values, and thence the relative measures of expanded uncertainty. Analysis of proficiency test data showed extreme values of RSD(R) up to +/-30% depending upon the organism, the laboratory and the method of examination. RSD(R) values on routine samples averaged around +/-12% but ranged up to +/-41% in a few instances. Internal quality assessments for different organisms ranged up to +/-27%, depending upon the particular organism and examination procedure. The results show little difference in uncertainty for counts obtained using different plating systems (e.g. pour plates, spread plates or spiral plating) on the same dilutions of the same food samples. The data are compared with estimates of microbiological uncertainty derived in interlaboratory studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimates of uncertainty ranged widely, both within and between laboratories, and appeared to bear little relationship to the foodstuff under examination. The extent of MU associated with many routine microbiological examinations is generally no worse than those produced in inter-laboratory trials, although notable exceptions were seen.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

Knowledge of the levels of MU may have wide impact on the establishment of international standard methods for microbiological examination of foods and the ability to set realistic microbiological criteria.

摘要

目的

确定食品能力验证和常规微生物分析中获得的测量不确定度(MU)水平,并将其与微生物方法协作实验室间研究中获得的分析结果的MU估计值进行比较。

方法与结果

食品检验能力评估计划参与者提交的原始数据来自中央科学实验室(约克)。内部质量监测数据来自健康保护局(HPA)实验室,以及HPA实验室进行的常规食品检验数据。对数据集进行分析,以确定基于log(10)菌落计数值得出的再现性相对标准偏差(RSD(R)),从而得出扩展不确定度的相对度量。能力验证测试数据分析表明,取决于生物体、实验室和检验方法,RSD(R)的极值高达±30%。常规样品的RSD(R)值平均约为±12%,但在少数情况下高达±41%。不同生物体的内部质量评估高达±27%,具体取决于特定生物体和检验程序。结果表明,在相同食品样品的相同稀释度下,使用不同平板接种系统(如倾注平板、涂布平板或螺旋接种)获得的计数不确定度差异不大。将这些数据与实验室间研究得出的微生物不确定度估计值进行比较。

结论

不确定度估计值在实验室内部和实验室之间差异很大,并且似乎与所检测的食品关系不大。与许多常规微生物检验相关的MU程度通常不比实验室间试验产生的结果差,尽管也有明显例外。

研究的意义和影响

MU水平的知识可能对建立食品微生物检验的国际标准方法以及设定实际微生物标准的能力产生广泛影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验