Sytema S, Wunderink L, Bloemers W, Roorda L, Wiersma D
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007 Aug;116(2):105-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01021.x.
Assertive community treatment is rapidly implemented by many European mental health services, but recently the evidence base has been questioned. Positive results of randomized trials in the USA were not replicated in the UK. The question is whether the UK findings are representative for other European countries with modern mental health services.
Open randomized controlled trial of long-term severely mentally ill patients [Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) total score >or=15], assigned to assertive community treatment (n = 59) or to standard community mental health care (n = 59).
sustained contact; housing stability and admission days. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomized Clinical Trial, number ISRCTN 11281756.
Assertive community treatment was significantly better in sustaining contact with patients, but not in reducing admission days. No differences in housing stability, psychopathology, social functioning or quality of life were found.
The results are in agreement with UK studies. However, the sustained contact potential of assertive community treatment is important, as too many patients are lost in standard care.
许多欧洲精神卫生服务机构迅速实施了积极社区治疗,但最近其证据基础受到了质疑。美国随机试验的积极结果在英国并未得到重复验证。问题在于英国的研究结果对于其他拥有现代精神卫生服务的欧洲国家是否具有代表性。
对长期重症精神病患者[全国健康结果量表(HoNOS)总分≥15]进行开放随机对照试验,分为积极社区治疗组(n = 59)和标准社区精神卫生护理组(n = 59)。
持续接触;住房稳定性和住院天数。该试验已注册为国际标准随机临床试验,编号为ISRCTN 11281756。
积极社区治疗在与患者保持接触方面明显更好,但在减少住院天数方面并无效果。在住房稳定性、精神病理学、社会功能或生活质量方面未发现差异。
结果与英国的研究一致。然而,积极社区治疗在持续接触方面的潜力很重要,因为在标准护理中有太多患者流失。