• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受积极社区治疗患者的治疗效果。

Treatment outcome in patients receiving assertive community treatment.

机构信息

Parnassia Bavo Group, BavoEuropoort, Westersingel 94, 3015 LC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2010 Aug;46(4):330-6. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9257-9. Epub 2009 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-009-9257-9
PMID:19847646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2910892/
Abstract

In an observational study of severely mentally ill patients treated in assertive community treatment (ACT) teams, we investigated how treatment outcome was associated with demographic factors, clinical factors, and motivation for treatment. To determine psychosocial outcome, patients were routinely assessed using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Trends over time were analyzed using a mixed model with repeated measures. The HoNOS total score was modeled as a function of treatment duration and patient-dependent covariates. Data comprised 637 assessments of 139 patients; mean duration of follow-up was 27.4 months (SD = 5.4). Substance abuse, higher age, problems with motivation, and lower educational level were associated with higher HoNOS total scores (i.e., worse outcome). To improve treatment outcome, we recommend better implementation of ACT, and also the implementation of additional programs targeting subgroups which seem to benefit less from ACT.

摘要

在一项针对接受积极社区治疗(ACT)团队治疗的严重精神疾病患者的观察性研究中,我们调查了治疗结果与人口统计学因素、临床因素和治疗动机之间的关系。为了确定心理社会结果,患者通常使用国民健康结果量表(HoNOS)进行常规评估。使用具有重复测量的混合模型分析随时间的趋势。HoNOS 总分被建模为治疗持续时间和患者相关协变量的函数。数据包括 139 名患者的 637 次评估;平均随访时间为 27.4 个月(SD=5.4)。药物滥用、年龄较大、动机问题和较低的教育水平与较高的 HoNOS 总分(即较差的结果)相关。为了改善治疗结果,我们建议更好地实施 ACT,并且还实施针对似乎从 ACT 获益较少的亚组的额外计划。

相似文献

1
Treatment outcome in patients receiving assertive community treatment.接受积极社区治疗患者的治疗效果。
Community Ment Health J. 2010 Aug;46(4):330-6. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9257-9. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
2
Assertive community treatment for the seriously mentally ill in suburban Sydney: a programme description and evaluation.悉尼郊区针对严重精神疾病患者的积极社区治疗:项目描述与评估
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;28(3):438-45. doi: 10.3109/00048679409075871.
3
Assertive community treatment in the Netherlands: a randomized controlled trial.荷兰的积极社区治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007 Aug;116(2):105-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01021.x.
4
Do community mental health teams caring for severely mentally ill patients adjust treatments and services based on patients' antisocial or criminal behaviours?负责照料重症精神病患者的社区心理健康团队会根据患者的反社会或犯罪行为来调整治疗方法和服务吗?
Eur Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;24(6):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.07.009. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
5
Benzodiazepine use and abuse among patients with severe mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders.患有严重精神疾病且同时存在物质使用障碍的患者中苯二氮䓬类药物的使用与滥用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Oct;54(10):1395-401. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.10.1395.
6
Psychosocial treatments for people with co-occurring severe mental illnesses and substance use disorders (dual diagnosis): a review of empirical evidence.针对同时患有严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍(双重诊断)患者的心理社会治疗:实证证据综述
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2009;17(1):24-34. doi: 10.1080/10673220902724599.
7
Feasibility and usefulness of training assertive community treatment team in cognitive behavioral therapy.培训积极社区治疗团队进行认知行为治疗的可行性和有效性。
Community Ment Health J. 2010 Aug;46(4):337-41. doi: 10.1007/s10597-009-9271-y. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
8
Randomized controlled trial of contingency management for stimulant use in community mental health patients with serious mental illness.随机对照试验:在社区精神卫生患者中有严重精神疾病的兴奋剂使用中的权变管理。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;170(1):94-101. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11121831.
9
Impact of assertive community treatment on homeless persons with co-occurring severe psychiatric and substance use disorders.积极社区治疗对同时患有严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍的无家可归者的影响。
Community Ment Health J. 1997 Apr;33(2):113-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1022419316396.
10
Long-term course of substance use disorders among patients with severe mental illness.严重精神疾病患者物质使用障碍的长期病程
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Mar;46(3):248-51. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.3.248.

引用本文的文献

1
Change in care needs of people with severe mental illness with and without a non-Western migration background: are their needs equally served throughout treatment?有和没有非西方移民背景的严重精神疾病患者护理需求的变化:在整个治疗过程中他们的需求是否得到同等满足?
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 9. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02765-4.
2
Trajectories of patients with severe mental illness in two-year contact with Flexible Assertive Community Treatment teams using Routine Outcome Monitoring data: An observational study.使用常规结果监测数据对两年内与灵活积极社区治疗团队接触的严重精神疾病患者的轨迹进行观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 9;14(1):e0207680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207680. eCollection 2019.
3
The effects of motivation feedback in patients with severe mental illness: a cluster randomized controlled trial.动机反馈对重症精神疾病患者的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Dec 11;11:3049-64. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S95190. eCollection 2015.
4
Predictors of Clinical Outcome of Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) in a Rural Area in Denmark: An Observational Study with a Two-Year Follow-Up.丹麦农村地区积极社区治疗(ACT)临床结局的预测因素:一项为期两年随访的观察性研究
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):908-913. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9908-y. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
5
Changes in individual needs for care and quality of life in Assertive Community Treatment patients: an observational study.在坚持社区治疗患者中,个体护理需求和生活质量的变化:一项观察性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 18;14:306. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0306-8.
6
Flexible Assertive Community Treatment, Severity of Symptoms and Psychiatric Health Service Use, a Real life Observational Study.灵活的积极社区治疗、症状严重程度与精神卫生服务利用:一项现实生活观察性研究
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2013 Nov 28;9:202-9. doi: 10.2174/1745017901309010202. eCollection 2013.
7
Can assertive community treatment remedy patients dropping out of treatment due to fragmented services?可以断言,由于服务碎片化,社区强化治疗可以补救因治疗而中断的患者吗?
Community Ment Health J. 2014 May;50(4):454-9. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9652-0. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
8
The motivation paradox: higher psychosocial problem levels in severely mentally ill patients are associated with less motivation for treatment.动机悖论:严重精神疾病患者的心理社会问题水平越高,治疗动机越低。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;49(4):541-8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0779-7. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
9
Parents served by assertive community treatment: parenting needs, services, and attitudes.接受积极社区治疗的父母:育儿需求、服务和态度。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Mar;36(1):22-7. doi: 10.1037/h0094743.
10
Changes in motivation for treatment in precontemplating dually diagnosed patients receiving assertive community treatment.接受积极社区治疗的处于考虑治疗前期的双重诊断患者的治疗动机变化。
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Dec;49(6):733-41. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9582-2. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
WITHDRAWN: Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental disorders.撤回:针对严重精神障碍患者的积极社区治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Apr 13;2011(4):CD001089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001089.pub2.
2
Outcome measures in early psychosis; relevance of duration of untreated psychosis.早期精神病的结局指标;未治疗精神病持续时间的相关性。
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2007 Aug;50:s58-63. doi: 10.1192/bjp.191.50.s58.
3
Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.干预措施的荟萃分析除了纳入随机对照试验外,是否还应包括观察性研究?对基本原理的批判性审视。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Nov 15;166(10):1203-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm189. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
4
Assertive community treatment in the Netherlands: a randomized controlled trial.荷兰的积极社区治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007 Aug;116(2):105-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.01021.x.
5
Outcome and its predictors in schizophrenia within the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort.芬兰北部1966年出生队列中精神分裂症的结局及其预测因素。
Eur Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;22(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.07.001. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
6
Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: a review of the literature.女性药物滥用治疗的入院、留存率及治疗效果:文献综述
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Jan 5;86(1):1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.05.012. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
7
Sex differences in outcome and recovery for schizophrenia and other psychotic and nonpsychotic disorders.精神分裂症及其他精神性和非精神性疾病在预后和康复方面的性别差异。
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Jun;57(6):844-50. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.6.844.
8
The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in north London.REACT研究:伦敦北部积极社区治疗的随机评估。
BMJ. 2006 Apr 8;332(7545):815-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38773.518322.7C. Epub 2006 Mar 16.
9
Lack of motivation for treatment in emergency psychiatry patients.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;40(6):484-8. doi: 10.1007/s00127-005-0913-2.
10
The token economy for schizophrenia: review of the literature and recommendations for future research.精神分裂症的代币经济:文献综述与未来研究建议
Schizophr Res. 2005 Jun 15;75(2-3):405-16. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.08.026.