Lin Hui-Ling, Restrepo Ruben D, Gardenhire Douglas S, Rau Joseph L
Respiratory Care Program, Dakota State University, South Dakota, USA.
Respir Care. 2007 Aug;52(8):1021-6.
Aerosol face mask design and the distance at which the face mask is held from the face affect the delivery of nebulized medication to pediatric patients.
To measure the inhaled mass of nebulized albuterol with 3 types of pediatric face mask, at 3 different distances from the face, with a model of a spontaneously breathing infant.
We compared a standard pediatric face mask and 2 proprietary pediatric face masks (one shaped to resemble a dragon face, the other shaped to resemble a fish face). The albuterol was nebulized with a widely used jet nebulizer. Aerosol delivery with each type of mask was measured with the mask at 0 cm (ie, mask directly applied to the mannequin face), 1 cm, and 2 cm from the mannequin face. In each test the nebulizer was filled with a 3-mL unit dose of albuterol sulfate and powered by oxygen at 8 L/min, with a total nebulization time of 5 min. The mannequin face was connected to a lung simulator that simulated a spontaneously breathing infant. We measured inhaled mass by collecting the aerosol on a 2-way anesthesia filter that was attached to the back of the mannequin's oral opening via a 15-mm silicon adapter. We also measured residual drug left in the nebulizer, and estimated the drug lost to the atmosphere.
The mean +/- SD inhaled percentage of the nominal dose values at 0 cm, 1 cm, and 2 cm, respectively, were 2.18 +/- 0.53%, 1.45 +/- 0.46%, and 0.92 +/- 0.51% with the standard mask; 2.65 +/- 0.55%, 1.7 +/- 0.38%, and 1.3 +/- 0.37% with the dragon mask; and 3.67 +/- 0.8%, 2.92 +/- 0.4%, and 2.26 +/- 0.56% with the fish mask. With all 3 masks there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in inhaled mass between the 0 cm and 2 cm distance. The fish mask had a significantly higher (p < 0.001) inhaled mass than the dragon mask or the standard mask, at all 3 distances.
The inhaled mass of albuterol is significantly reduced when the mask is moved away from the face. The fish mask had significantly higher inhaled mass than the standard mask or the dragon mask, under the conditions we studied. Mask design may affect nebulized albuterol delivery to pediatric patients.
雾化面罩的设计以及面罩与面部保持的距离会影响雾化药物输送给儿科患者的效果。
使用自发呼吸婴儿模型,测量在距面部3个不同距离处使用3种儿科面罩时雾化沙丁胺醇的吸入量。
我们比较了一种标准儿科面罩和两种专利儿科面罩(一种形状类似龙脸,另一种形状类似鱼脸)。使用广泛应用的喷射雾化器雾化沙丁胺醇。每种面罩在距人体模型面部0厘米(即面罩直接贴在人体模型面部)、1厘米和2厘米处时测量气雾剂输送情况。每次测试中,雾化器装入3毫升单位剂量的硫酸沙丁胺醇,由8升/分钟的氧气驱动,总雾化时间为5分钟。人体模型面部连接到模拟自发呼吸婴儿的肺模拟器。我们通过将气雾剂收集在一个双向麻醉滤器上来测量吸入量,该滤器通过一个15毫米的硅胶适配器连接到人体模型口腔开口的后部。我们还测量了雾化器中剩余的药物,并估算了散失到空气中的药物量。
标准面罩在0厘米、1厘米和2厘米处的标称剂量值的平均吸入百分比分别为2.18±0.53%、1.45±0.46%和0.92±0.51%;龙形面罩分别为2.65±0.55%、1.7±0.38%和1.3±0.37%;鱼形面罩分别为3.67±0.8%、2.92±0.4%和2.26±0.56%。对于所有3种面罩,0厘米和2厘米距离处的吸入量在统计学上有显著差异(p<0.001)。在所有3个距离处,鱼形面罩的吸入量均显著高于(p<0.001)龙形面罩或标准面罩。
当面罩远离面部时,沙丁胺醇的吸入量会显著降低。在我们研究的条件下,鱼形面罩的吸入量显著高于标准面罩或龙形面罩。面罩设计可能会影响雾化沙丁胺醇输送给儿科患者的效果。