Feng Tao, Zhang Shuanglin, Sha Qiuying
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Nov;15(11):1169-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201902. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
Recently, Steen et al proposed a two-stage approach for genome-wide family-based association studies. In the first stage, a screening test is used to select markers, and in the second stage, a family-based association test is performed on a much smaller set of the selected markers. The two-stage method can be much more powerful than the traditional family-based association tests. In this article, we extend the approach so that it can incorporate parental information and can be applied to an arbitrary pedigree structure. We use simulation studies to evaluate the type I error rates and the power of the proposed methods. Our results show that the two-stage approach that incorporates founders' phenotypes has the correct type I error rates, and is much more powerful than the two-stage approach that uses children's phenotypes only. Also, by carefully choosing the number of markers retained in the first stage, the power of a two-stage approach can be much more than that of the corresponding one-stage approach.
最近,斯汀等人提出了一种用于全基因组基于家系的关联研究的两阶段方法。在第一阶段,使用一种筛选测试来选择标记,而在第二阶段,对所选标记中数量少得多的一组进行基于家系的关联测试。这种两阶段方法可能比传统的基于家系的关联测试更有效力。在本文中,我们扩展了该方法,使其能够纳入亲本信息并可应用于任意系谱结构。我们使用模拟研究来评估所提出方法的I型错误率和效力。我们的结果表明,纳入奠基者表型的两阶段方法具有正确的I型错误率,并且比仅使用子代表型的两阶段方法效力要强得多。此外,通过仔细选择在第一阶段保留的标记数量,两阶段方法的效力可比相应的单阶段方法强得多。