• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Microbiologic and histologic assessment of intentional bacterial contamination of bone grafts.

作者信息

Yaman Ferhan, Unlü Gülten, Atilgan Serhat, Celik Yusuf, Ozekinci Tuncer, Yaldiz Mehmet

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Dicle University, Diyarbakir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Aug;65(8):1490-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.027.

DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.027
PMID:17656273
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate methods of removing pathogenic micro-organisms from bone grafts that have been contaminated during surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Femora were removed from Sprague-Dawley rats and were divided into sections and contaminated in solutions of the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. Contaminated bone specimens in each group were immersed in various solutions for specified periods so their antibacterial effects could be evaluated. After these procedures were performed, bone specimens were cultured in nutrient media. Bone structure was evaluated, and the appropriate decontamination method was selected.

RESULTS

Solutions such as povidone-iodine, neomycin, cephazolin sodium, and rifamycin were found to be effective decontaminants. These solutions did not damage the bone structure. Among these solutions, only rifamycin was effective against all bacteria used in this study to contaminate bone grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

Rifamycin seems to be the most suitable agent for the elimination of contamination introduced into bone grafts during surgery.

摘要

相似文献

1
Microbiologic and histologic assessment of intentional bacterial contamination of bone grafts.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Aug;65(8):1490-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.027.
2
Management of contaminated bone grafts: an experimental in vitro study.污染骨移植的处理:一项体外实验研究。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Jul;82(1):34-7. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80374-x.
3
Efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.隐形眼镜消毒溶液对金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的疗效。
Eye Contact Lens. 2006 Jul;32(4):216-8. doi: 10.1097/01.icl.0000194922.53171.39.
4
Practical limitations of disinfection of body fluid spills with 10,000 ppm sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl).使用10000 ppm次氯酸钠(NaOCl)对体液溢出物进行消毒的实际局限性。
Am J Infect Control. 2004 Aug;32(5):306-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.007.
5
The effect of 10% povidone--iodine solution on contaminated bone allografts.10%聚维酮碘溶液对污染同种异体骨移植的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2002 Mar;50(3):183-7. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1153.
6
Osseous coagulum collected in bone traps: potential for bacterial contamination and methods for decontamination.
J Oral Implantol. 2007;33(3):109-15. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[109:OCCIBT]2.0.CO;2.
7
Autogenous particulate bone collected with a piezo-electric surgical device and bone trap: a microbiological and histomorphometric study.使用压电手术设备和骨收集器采集的自体颗粒骨:一项微生物学和组织形态计量学研究。
Arch Oral Biol. 2006 Oct;51(10):883-91. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.04.001. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
8
Decontamination of autogenous bone grafts collected during dental implant site preparation: a pilot study.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 May;107(5):656-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
9
Are dropped osteoarticular bone fragments safely reimplantable in vivo?关节内骨碎片是否可安全地重新植入体内?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 2;93(5):430-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00793. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
10
Use of the 'ex vivo' test to study long-term bacterial survival on human skin and their sensitivity to antisepsis.使用“体外”试验研究细菌在人体皮肤上的长期存活情况及其对抗菌处理的敏感性。
J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97(6):1149-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02403.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a super-oxidized solution for decontaminating ACL grafts: a prospective study.一种超氧化溶液对前交叉韧带移植物去污的有效性:一项前瞻性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 14;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05571-z.
2
Comparison of the Sterilization Efficiency of 3 Disinfectants for Dropped Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.3种消毒剂对前交叉韧带移植失用移植物的消毒效果比较:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 May 10;9(5):23259671211002873. doi: 10.1177/23259671211002873. eCollection 2021 May.
3
High Potential of Bacterial Adhesion on Block Bone Graft Materials.
细菌在块状骨移植材料上的高粘附潜力。
Materials (Basel). 2020 May 1;13(9):2102. doi: 10.3390/ma13092102.
4
Successful Immediate Re-implantation of an Extruded Femoral Segment: a Case Report.成功即刻再植入挤出的股骨节段:一例报告。
HSS J. 2016 Jul;12(2):182-5. doi: 10.1007/s11420-015-9482-4. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
5
Reimplantation of an Extruded Femoral Segment After Gamma Sterilization in A Type IIIA Supracondylar Femur Fracture: A Case Report.γ射线灭菌后ⅢA型髁上股骨骨折挤压出的股骨段再植:1例报告
Malays Orthop J. 2014 Jul;8(2):66-8. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1407.015.