• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

细菌在块状骨移植材料上的高粘附潜力。

High Potential of Bacterial Adhesion on Block Bone Graft Materials.

作者信息

Nisyrios Themistoklis, Karygianni Lamprini, Fretwurst Tobias, Nelson Katja, Hellwig Elmar, Schmelzeisen Rainer, Al-Ahmad Ali

机构信息

Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Center for Dental Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2020 May 1;13(9):2102. doi: 10.3390/ma13092102.

DOI:10.3390/ma13092102
PMID:32370084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7254222/
Abstract

Bone graft infections represent a challenge in daily clinics, resulting in increased patient discomfort and graft removal. The aim of this study was to investigate the initial adhesion of five representative pathogens on three different block bone graft materials (xenogeneic, alloplastic and allogeneic) and to assess if chlorhexidine (CHX) can effectively control the initial bacterial adhesion. Three different block bone grafting materials (Tutobone®, Endobon® and human spongiosa) were incubated with , , , and in the presence or absence of 0.2% CHX solution. Bacterial adhesion was assessed by the direct counting of the colony-forming units (CFUs) and visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Overall, the selected bacterial species adhered successfully to all tested bone replacement scaffolds, which showed similar bacterial counts. The lg CFU values ranged from 5.29 ± 0.14 to 5.48 ± 0.72 for , from 4.37 ± 0.62 to 5.02 ± 0.48 for , from 4.92 ± 0.34 to 4.95 ± 0.21 for , from 4.97 ± 0.40 to 5.22 ± 0.13 for and from 4.23 ± 0.54 to 4.58 ± 0.26 for CHX did not interfere with initial microbial adhesion, and yet it killed all adhered bacterial cells. Thus, CHX can be used to prevent subsequent biofilm infections.

摘要

骨移植感染是日常临床工作中的一项挑战,会导致患者不适加剧以及移植骨被移除。本研究的目的是调查五种代表性病原体在三种不同块状骨移植材料(异种骨、人工合成骨和同种异体骨)上的初始黏附情况,并评估洗必泰(CHX)是否能有效控制细菌的初始黏附。将三种不同的块状骨移植材料(Tutobone®、Endobon®和人松质骨)在有或没有0.2% CHX溶液存在的情况下,与金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希菌、铜绿假单胞菌、粪肠球菌和白色念珠菌一起孵育。通过直接计数菌落形成单位(CFU)来评估细菌黏附情况,并通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行可视化观察。总体而言,所选细菌种类成功黏附于所有测试的骨替代支架,且细菌计数相似。金黄色葡萄球菌的lg CFU值范围为5.29±0.14至5.48±0.72,大肠埃希菌为4.37±0.62至5.02±0.48,铜绿假单胞菌为4.92±0.34至4.95±0.21,粪肠球菌为4.97±0.40至5.22±0.13,白色念珠菌为4.23±0.54至4.58±0.26。CHX并不干扰微生物的初始黏附,但它能杀死所有黏附的细菌细胞。因此,CHX可用于预防随后的生物膜感染。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/d6ee1466df3e/materials-13-02102-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/a83c8287ab65/materials-13-02102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/d3e8c0acda8e/materials-13-02102-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/4ebae5c00334/materials-13-02102-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/c7bdb41fac56/materials-13-02102-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/d6ee1466df3e/materials-13-02102-g005a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/a83c8287ab65/materials-13-02102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/d3e8c0acda8e/materials-13-02102-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/4ebae5c00334/materials-13-02102-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/c7bdb41fac56/materials-13-02102-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/7254222/d6ee1466df3e/materials-13-02102-g005a.jpg

相似文献

1
High Potential of Bacterial Adhesion on Block Bone Graft Materials.细菌在块状骨移植材料上的高粘附潜力。
Materials (Basel). 2020 May 1;13(9):2102. doi: 10.3390/ma13092102.
2
Ex vivo assessment of synergic effect of chlorhexidine for enhancing antimicrobial photodynamic therapy efficiency on expression patterns of biofilm-associated genes of Enterococcus faecalis.体外评估洗必泰增强抗菌光动力疗法对粪肠球菌生物膜相关基因表达模式的增效作用。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2018 Jun;22:227-232. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
3
Bacterial and Candida albicans adhesion on rapid prototyping-produced 3D-scaffolds manufactured as bone replacement materials.作为骨替代材料的快速成型制造的3D支架上的细菌和白色念珠菌黏附。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 Dec 15;87(4):933-43. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31832.
4
Microbial adhesion on novel yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP) implant surfaces with nitrogen-doped hydrogenated amorphous carbon (a-C:H:N) coatings.微生物在具有掺氮氢化非晶碳(a-C:H:N)涂层的新型钇稳定四方氧化锆(Y-TZP)种植体表面的黏附情况。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1719-32. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1655-5. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
5
Evolution of resistance to cationic biocides in Streptococcus mutans and Enterococcus faecalis.变形链球菌和粪肠球菌对阳离子杀菌剂耐药性的演变。
J Dent. 2016 Apr;47:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
6
Anti-sessile bacterial and cytocompatibility properties of CHX-loaded nanohydroxyapatite.载盐酸洗必泰纳米羟基磷灰石的抗细菌黏附及细胞相容性。
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015 Jun 1;130:305-14. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.04.034. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
7
Sinonasal Stent Coated with Slow-Release Varnish of Chlorhexidine Has Sustained Protection against Bacterial Biofilm Growth in the Sinonasal Cavity: An In Vitro Study.涂有洗必泰缓释清漆的鼻鼻窦支架对鼻鼻窦腔内细菌生物膜生长具有持续保护作用:一项体外研究。
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Oct 25;13(11):1783. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111783.
8
Effect of modified nonequilibrium plasma with chlorhexidine digluconate against endodontic biofilms in vitro.含葡萄糖酸洗必泰的改良非平衡等离子体对根管生物膜的体外作用
J Endod. 2013 Nov;39(11):1438-43. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.027. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
9
Antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine after final irrigation with ethanol: CLSM and culture-based method analysis.用乙醇进行最终冲洗后洗必泰的抗菌活性:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜和基于培养的方法分析
Microsc Res Tech. 2015 Aug;78(8):682-7. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22525. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
In vitro assessment of an antibacterial quaternary ammonium-based polymer loaded with chlorhexidine for the coating of polypropylene prosthetic meshes.负载洗必泰的抗菌季铵基聚合物用于聚丙烯人工补片涂层的体外评估
Hernia. 2016 Dec;20(6):869-878. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1537-z. Epub 2016 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Customized Bone Regeneration-A Retrospective Clinical Follow-Up Study of the Aesthetic Outcome.定制化骨再生——美学效果的回顾性临床随访研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Jun;36(6):759-770. doi: 10.1111/clr.14425. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
2
Traumatic Fracture Treatment: Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute Case-Control Study in Humerus, Radius, Tibia Fractures-Assessing Efficacy and Recovery Outcomes.创伤性骨折治疗:磷酸钙骨替代物在肱骨、桡骨、胫骨骨折中的病例对照研究——评估疗效和恢复结果
Biomedicines. 2023 Oct 22;11(10):2862. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11102862.
3
Role of periosteum during healing of alveolar critical size bone defects in the mandible: a pilot study.

本文引用的文献

1
A New Strategy Against Peri-Implantitis: Antibacterial Internal Coating.一种对抗种植体周围炎的新策略:抗菌内涂层。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 9;20(16):3897. doi: 10.3390/ijms20163897.
2
Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria - Is There Cause for Concern?口腔细菌对洗必泰的耐药性——是否值得担忧?
Front Microbiol. 2019 Mar 22;10:587. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00587. eCollection 2019.
3
Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial?骨移植材料:哪种是理想的生物材料?
骨膜在颌骨临界尺寸牙槽骨缺损愈合中的作用:一项初步研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4541-4552. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05079-y. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
Bioengineering Approaches to Fight against Orthopedic Biomaterials Related-Infections.生物工程方法防治骨科生物材料相关性感染
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 1;23(19):11658. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911658.
5
Bio-Interactive Zwitterionic Dental Biomaterials for Improving Biofilm Resistance: Characteristics and Applications.用于提高抗生物膜性能的生物交互两性离子牙科生物材料:特性和应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Nov 29;21(23):9087. doi: 10.3390/ijms21239087.
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:92-102. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13058.
4
The Processing of Xenografts Will Result in Different Clinical Responses.异种移植的处理会导致不同的临床反应。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Apr;77(4):690-697. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
5
Mandibular ridge reconstruction: A review of contemporary methods.下颌骨嵴重建:当代方法综述。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Aug;27(8):1159-1168. doi: 10.17219/acem/74054.
6
The Fate of Lateral Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.侧方骨嵴增高术的预后:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):622-635. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6290.
7
The Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Reducing Bacterial Contamination of Autologous Bone Graft Collected from Implant Site.抗生素预防在减少种植体部位自体骨移植物细菌污染中的作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2175019. doi: 10.1155/2017/2175019. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
8
A Bone Sample Containing a Bone Graft Substitute Analyzed by Correlating Density Information Obtained by X-ray Micro Tomography with Compositional Information Obtained by Raman Microscopy.通过将X射线显微断层扫描获得的密度信息与拉曼显微镜获得的成分信息相关联来分析含有骨移植替代物的骨样本。
Materials (Basel). 2015 Jun 25;8(7):3831-3853. doi: 10.3390/ma8073831.
9
Vertical Ridge Augmentation in the Atrophic Mandible: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.萎缩性下颌骨垂直骨嵴增高术:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):291-312. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4861.
10
Infection in Bone Allograft Transplants.骨移植中的感染
Exp Clin Transplant. 2016 Oct;14(5):484-490.