Wiegand A, Köwing L, Attin T
Clinic for Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zürich, Plattenstrasse 11, CH-8032 Zürich, Switzerland.
Arch Oral Biol. 2007 Nov;52(11):1043-7. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
The study aimed to analyse the effects of different brushing loads on abrasion of acid-softened and sound enamel surfaces.
Sound and acid-softened surfaces of each 10 human enamel samples were submitted to brushing abrasion in an automatic brushing machine at 1.5 N (A), 2.5 N (B), 3.5 N (C) or 4.5 N (D) brushing load. Prior to abrasion, demineralisation of half of each enamel surface was performed by storage in hydrochloric acid (pH 2.0) for 60s. Brushing was carried out (1000 strokes) using a manual toothbrush and toothpaste slurry in a ratio of 1:3. Enamel loss was measured after 10, 20, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350 and 1000 brushing strokes (BS). Pre- and post-brushing values of Knoop indentation length (5 indentations each sample) were measured and mean enamel loss was calculated from the change in indentation depth. Within- and between-group comparisons were performed by ANOVA and t-test followed by Bonferroni-correction.
Enamel loss of acid-softened surfaces was significantly influenced by the brushing load applied and was mostly significantly higher in group D (10-1000 BS: 225-462 nm) compared to A (10-1000 BS: 164-384), B (10-1000 BS: 175-370 nm) and C (10-1000 BS: 191-396 nm). Abrasion of acid-softened enamel was fourfold higher compared to sound surfaces. Sound enamel was significantly influenced by the brushing force at 20-200 brushing strokes only, but revealed no significant differences between groups A-D.
Brushing load influences abrasion of briefly eroded enamel, but might be of minor importance for abrasion of sound enamel surfaces.
本研究旨在分析不同刷牙负荷对酸软化釉质表面和正常釉质表面磨损的影响。
将10个人类釉质样本的正常表面和酸软化表面在自动刷牙机中以1.5 N(A)、2.5 N(B)、3.5 N(C)或4.5 N(D)的刷牙负荷进行刷牙磨损实验。在磨损前,将每个釉质表面的一半通过在盐酸(pH 2.0)中储存60秒进行脱矿处理。使用手动牙刷和比例为1:3的牙膏糊进行刷牙(1000次刷动)。在10、20、50、100、150、200、250、300、350和1000次刷牙刷动(BS)后测量釉质损失。测量努氏压痕长度的刷牙前后值(每个样本5次压痕),并根据压痕深度的变化计算平均釉质损失。组内和组间比较采用方差分析和t检验,随后进行Bonferroni校正。
酸软化表面的釉质损失受刷牙负荷的显著影响,与A组(10 - 1000 BS:164 - 384 nm)、B组(10 - 1000 BS:175 - 370 nm)和C组(10 - 1000 BS:191 - 396 nm)相比,D组(10 - 1000 BS:225 - 462 nm)的釉质损失大多显著更高。酸软化釉质的磨损比正常表面高四倍。正常釉质仅在20 - 200次刷牙刷动时受刷牙力的显著影响,但A - D组之间无显著差异。
刷牙负荷会影响短暂侵蚀釉质的磨损,但对正常釉质表面的磨损可能影响较小。