Jesri Ammar, Braitman Leonard E, Pressman Gregg S
Department of Medicine, St. Francis Medical Center and Seton Hall University, Trenton, NJ, United States.
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Aug 18;128(2):193-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.05.015. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is common in the elderly and is associated with atherosclerosis, sharing many of the same risk factors. It is also frequent among dialysis patients. We hypothesized that in general cardiology patients without kidney failure, MAC, especially when severe, may be a marker for renal dysfunction.
Forty-one subjects were identified by searching outpatient echocardiogram reports for phrases indicating severe MAC. These were divided into subgroups based on greater or lesser overall intracardiac calcification. The "MAC mobile" subgroup had calcification largely limited to the posterior annulus with normal anterior mitral leaflet mobility. In the "MAC restricted" subgroup, calcification extended to the anterior annulus and limited anterior mitral leaflet mobility. These latter patients also had more severe aortic valve calcification. Seventy-seven controls with minimal or no intracardiac calcification were used for comparison.
The total MAC group had worse renal function, measured by creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), than controls (p<0.001 for both comparisons). Nearly 60% had chronic kidney disease as defined by a GFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) with a relative risk of 1.8 versus controls. GFR was observed to decline in a graded fashion as calcification increased (control versus "MAC mobile" versus "MAC restricted"). Though this trend did not remain statistically significant after controlling for age and gender, GFR was substantially lower in "MAC restricted" versus "MAC mobile" patients (p=0.03).
Severe MAC on echocardiogram points to a strong likelihood of chronic kidney disease. Further study is needed to explore a possible graded relationship between severity of MAC and severity of renal dysfunction.
二尖瓣环钙化(MAC)在老年人中很常见,与动脉粥样硬化相关,有许多相同的危险因素。在透析患者中也很常见。我们推测,在一般无肾衰竭的心脏病患者中,MAC,尤其是重度MAC,可能是肾功能不全的一个标志物。
通过搜索门诊超声心动图报告中提示重度MAC的短语确定了41名受试者。根据心脏内钙化程度的高低将他们分为亚组。“MAC可动”亚组的钙化主要局限于后瓣环,二尖瓣前叶活动正常。在“MAC受限”亚组中,钙化扩展至前瓣环并限制二尖瓣前叶活动。后一组患者的主动脉瓣钙化也更严重。77名心脏内钙化极少或无钙化的对照者用于比较。
总的MAC组,通过肌酐和肾小球滤过率(GFR)测量的肾功能比对照组差(两项比较p均<0.001)。近60%的患者患有慢性肾脏病,定义为GFR<60 ml/min/1.73 m²,相对风险是对照组的1.8倍。随着钙化增加,GFR呈分级下降趋势(对照组与“MAC可动”组与“MAC受限”组比较)。尽管在控制年龄和性别后这一趋势不再具有统计学意义,但“MAC受限”组患者的GFR显著低于“MAC可动”组患者(p = 0.03)。
超声心动图显示的重度MAC提示慢性肾脏病的可能性很大。需要进一步研究来探讨MAC严重程度与肾功能不全严重程度之间可能存在的分级关系。