Suppr超能文献

心脏稳定器真的能起到稳定作用吗?机械稳定作用的实验定量分析。

Do cardiac stabilizers really stabilize? Experimental quantitative analysis of mechanical stabilization.

作者信息

Lemma Massimo, Mangini Andrea, Redaelli Alberto, Acocella Fabio

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Luigi Sacco Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005 Jun;4(3):222-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2004.098517. Epub 2005 Mar 29.

Abstract

In order to assess the three-dimensional movement of the coronary arteries both during normal cardiac activity and after mechanical stabilization, a polypropylene black marker was placed in 10 pigs on the middle portion of the three main coronary branches. Marker motion was recorded for 10 s using two TV-digital cameras and was estimated with a precision of 50 microm. After stabilization with three different mechanical stabilizers (Medtronic, Genzyme, CTS-Guidant), a remnant coronary artery excursion of about 1.5-2.4 mm was found. There is a significant residual coronary artery motion after mechanical stabilization, which could affect the quality of anastomosis, especially in unfavourable situations.

摘要

为了评估正常心脏活动期间以及机械稳定后冠状动脉的三维运动,在10头猪的三条主要冠状动脉分支的中部放置了一个聚丙烯黑色标记物。使用两台电视数字摄像机记录标记物运动10秒,估计精度为50微米。在用三种不同的机械稳定器(美敦力、健赞、CTS-吉迪恩特)进行稳定后,发现冠状动脉残余偏移约为1.5-2.4毫米。机械稳定后冠状动脉存在明显的残余运动,这可能会影响吻合质量,尤其是在不利情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验