Mackay Lisa M, Schofield Grant M, Schluter Philip J
Center for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research at the Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007 Jun;78(3):189-96. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2007.10599416.
Accurate measurement of physical activity is fundamentally important in epidemiological research of physical activity behavior A widely used telephone-based physical activity questionnaire was compared with other methods of administration and objective measures (pedometers and accelerometers) among 80 adults (43 women). The telephone questionnaire was comparable to both the self-administered form and international telephone-administered equivalent. Although moderate correlation coefficients with objective measures supported the use of the questionnaire, wide prediction intervals generated using Bland Altman methods highlighted large discrepancies between the measures, particularly in the moderate intensity category. These findings illustrate the limitations of correlation coefficients in validation studies and the inaccuracy of self-report questionnaires in measuring physical activity.
在身体活动行为的流行病学研究中,准确测量身体活动至关重要。在80名成年人(43名女性)中,将一种广泛使用的基于电话的身体活动问卷与其他管理方法及客观测量方法(计步器和加速度计)进行了比较。该电话问卷与自行填写的表格以及国际电话等效问卷相当。尽管与客观测量方法的中度相关系数支持该问卷的使用,但采用布兰德-奥特曼方法生成的宽预测区间突出了这些测量方法之间的巨大差异,尤其是在中等强度类别中。这些发现说明了验证研究中相关系数的局限性以及自我报告问卷在测量身体活动方面的不准确之处。