Suppr超能文献

使用国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)和加速度计评估纤维肌痛患者的体力活动比较:安达卢西亚研究。

Comparison of physical activity estimates using International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and accelerometry in fibromyalgia patients: the Al-Andalus study.

机构信息

a University of Granada , Granada , Spain.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2013;31(16):1741-52. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.803594. Epub 2013 Jul 22.

Abstract

The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) has been widely used to assess physical activity in healthy populations. The present study compared physical activity assessed by the long, self-administrated version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire with physical activity assessed by accelerometry in patients with fibromyalgia. A total of 99 (five men) participants with fibromyalgia completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and wore an accelerometer for nine consecutive days. We analysed the correlations of physical activity expressed as min · day(-1) of light, moderate, vigorous, and moderate to vigorous (MVPA) intensity, as well as time spent sitting, by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and accelerometry by Spearman correlations. Bland and Altman plots were performed to verify the agreements between both instruments. The results showed weak yet significant correlations (Rs = 0.15-0.39, all P < 0.05) in all physical activity intensities between the two instruments, except for sedentary time. The highest correlations were observed for physical activity at home or in garden (Rs = 0.297, P < 0.01). The results suggest that the long self-administrated International Physical Activity Questionnaire is a questionable instrument to assess physical activity in patients with fibromyalgia. Therefore, physical activity measurement in fibromyalgia patients should not be limited solely to self-reported measures.

摘要

国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)已被广泛用于评估健康人群的体力活动。本研究比较了通过长的、自我管理的国际体力活动问卷评估的体力活动与通过加速度计评估的纤维肌痛患者的体力活动。共有 99 名(5 名男性)纤维肌痛患者完成了国际体力活动问卷,并连续 9 天佩戴加速度计。我们通过 Spearman 相关分析,分析了用国际体力活动问卷表示的轻、中、剧烈和中到剧烈强度的体力活动(MVPA)以及久坐时间的 min·天(-1)的相关性,以及用加速度计评估的体力活动。通过 Bland 和 Altman 图验证了两种仪器之间的一致性。结果表明,两种仪器之间除了久坐时间外,所有体力活动强度的相关性都较弱但有统计学意义(Rs = 0.15-0.39,均 P < 0.05)。相关性最高的是在家中或花园中的体力活动(Rs = 0.297,P < 0.01)。结果表明,长的自我管理的国际体力活动问卷是评估纤维肌痛患者体力活动的一个有疑问的工具。因此,对纤维肌痛患者的体力活动测量不应仅局限于自我报告的测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验