Farrell Laurel J, Kerrigan Sarah, Logan Barry K
Colorado Bureau of Investigation, 690 Kipling St., Suite 4000, Denver, CO 80215, USA.
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Sep;52(5):1214-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00516.x. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
Investigation of a suspected alcohol or drug impaired driving (DUID) case ideally contains several key elements, including a trained officer documenting observations of driving and subject behavior, and collection of a biological specimen for comprehensive toxicology testing. There is currently no common standard of practice among forensic toxicology laboratories in the United States as to which drugs should be tested for, and at what analytical cutoff. Having some uniformity of practice among laboratories would ensure that drugs most frequently associated with driving impairment were consistently evaluated, that appropriate methods were used to screen and confirm the presence of drugs, and that more accurate data were collected on the extent of drug use among drivers. A survey of United States laboratories actively involved in providing analytical support to the Drug Evaluation and Classification Program identified marijuana, benzodiazepines, cocaine, prescription and illicit opiates, muscle relaxants, amphetamines, CNS depressants, and sleep aids used as hypnotics, as being the most frequently encountered drugs in these cases. This manuscript presents recommendations as to what specific members of these drug classes should at a minimum be tested for in the investigation of suspected DUID cases. Additionally we include recommendations for analytical cutoffs for screening and confirmation of drugs in blood and urine. Adopting these guidelines would ensure that the most common drugs would be detected, that laboratories could compare epidemiological findings between jurisdictions, and that aggregate national statistics on alcohol and drug use in drivers involved in fatal injury collisions were representative of the true rates of drug use in the driving population.
对疑似酒精或药物影响驾驶(DUID)案件的调查理想情况下应包含几个关键要素,包括训练有素的警官记录驾驶和当事人行为的观察情况,以及采集生物样本进行全面的毒理学检测。目前,美国法医毒理学实验室对于应检测哪些药物以及采用何种分析临界值尚无统一的实践标准。实验室之间在实践上保持一定的一致性将确保对与驾驶能力受损最常相关的药物进行持续评估,采用适当的方法筛选和确认药物的存在,并收集关于驾驶员药物使用程度的更准确数据。一项对积极参与为药物评估和分类计划提供分析支持的美国实验室的调查表明,大麻、苯二氮卓类药物、可卡因、处方和非法阿片类药物、肌肉松弛剂、苯丙胺类药物、中枢神经系统抑制剂以及用作催眠药的助眠剂,是这些案件中最常遇到的药物。本手稿针对在疑似DUID案件调查中这些药物类别中至少应检测哪些特定成员提出了建议。此外,我们还包括了血液和尿液中药物筛选和确认的分析临界值建议。采用这些指南将确保能够检测到最常见的药物,实验室能够比较不同司法管辖区的流行病学调查结果,并且关于涉及致命伤害碰撞的驾驶员酒精和药物使用情况的全国汇总统计数据能够代表驾驶人群中药物使用的真实比率。