Vorhold V, Giessing C, Wiedemann P M, Schütz H, Gauggel S, Fink G R
Institute of Neuroscience and Biophysics, Program Group Humans, Environment, Technology (MUT), Research Centre Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Nov 5;45(14):3242-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.023. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
Research investigating risk perception suggests that not only the quantitative parameters used in technical risk assessment (i.e., frequency and severity of harm) but also 'qualitative' aspects such as the dread a hazard provokes or its controllability influence risk judgments. It remains to be elucidated, however, which neural mechanism underlie risk ratings in healthy subjects. Using fMRI to detect changes in neural activity we compared the neural activations elicited by risk ratings with those elicited by a letter detection task performed on the same stimuli. The latter task served to control for basic stimulus processing, response selection and button-pressing during task performance. Risk ratings differentially activated the medial prefrontal cortex, the inferior frontal gyrus, the cerebellum (P<0.05, FWE corrected, whole brain approach), and in an additional ROI analysis the amygdala (P<0.05, FWE corrected). Of these structures, particularly the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex have been previously associated with decisions about affective interference. Furthermore our data suggest both, similarities and differences between the neural correlates of risk ratings and risk taking as involved, for e.g., in gambling tasks.
关于风险认知的研究表明,不仅技术风险评估中使用的定量参数(即伤害的频率和严重程度),而且诸如危险引发的恐惧或其可控性等“定性”方面也会影响风险判断。然而,健康受试者风险评级背后的神经机制仍有待阐明。我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来检测神经活动的变化,将风险评级引发的神经激活与对相同刺激执行字母检测任务引发的神经激活进行了比较。后一项任务用于控制任务执行期间的基本刺激处理、反应选择和按键操作。风险评级差异性地激活了内侧前额叶皮层、额下回、小脑(P<0.05,经FWE校正,全脑分析),并且在额外的感兴趣区域(ROI)分析中激活了杏仁核(P<0.05,经FWE校正)。在这些结构中,特别是杏仁核和前额叶皮层先前已与情感干扰决策相关联。此外,我们的数据表明,风险评级的神经关联与例如赌博任务中涉及的冒险行为的神经关联之间既有相似之处,也有不同之处。