Suppr超能文献

紧急和评估行为背后的神经机制:一项关于自动与受控过程相互作用的功能磁共振成像研究。

Neural mechanisms underlying urgent and evaluative behaviors: An fMRI study on the interaction of automatic and controlled processes.

作者信息

Megías Alberto, Navas Juan Francisco, Petrova Dafina, Cándido Antonio, Maldonado Antonio, Garcia-Retamero Rocio, Catena Andrés

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Emotion and Decision Group, Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Aug;36(8):2853-64. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22812. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

Abstract

Dual-process theories have dominated the study of risk perception and risk-taking over the last two decades. However, there is a lack of objective brain-level evidence supporting the two systems of processing in every-day risky behavior. To address this issue, we propose the dissociation between evaluative and urgent behaviors as evidence of dual processing in risky driving situations. Our findings show a dissociation of evaluative and urgent behavior both at the behavioral and neural level. fMRI data showed an increase of activation in areas implicated in motor programming, emotional processing, and visuomotor integration in urgent behavior compared to evaluative behavior. These results support a more automatic processing of risk in urgent tasks, relying mainly on heuristics and experiential appraisal. The urgent task, which is characterized by strong time pressure and the possibility for negative consequences among others factors, creates a suitable context for the experiential-affective system to guide the decision-making process. Moreover, we observed greater frontal activation in the urgent task, suggesting the participation of cognitive control in safe behaviors. The findings of this research are relevant for the study of the neural mechanisms underlying dual process models in risky perception and decision-making, especially because of their proximity to everyday activities.

摘要

在过去二十年里,双加工理论主导了风险感知和冒险行为的研究。然而,缺乏客观的大脑层面证据来支持日常危险行为中的两种加工系统。为解决这一问题,我们提出将评估行为与紧急行为分离,以此作为危险驾驶情境中双加工的证据。我们的研究结果显示,在行为和神经层面,评估行为与紧急行为均存在分离。功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据表明,与评估行为相比,紧急行为中涉及运动编程、情绪加工和视觉运动整合的脑区激活增加。这些结果支持了在紧急任务中对风险进行更自动的加工,主要依赖启发式和经验性评估。紧急任务具有强烈的时间压力以及可能产生负面后果等特点,为经验 - 情感系统引导决策过程创造了合适的情境。此外,我们观察到紧急任务中额叶激活更强,这表明认知控制参与了安全行为。本研究结果对于风险感知和决策中双加工模型的神经机制研究具有重要意义,特别是因为它们与日常活动密切相关。

相似文献

10
Decision-making under risk: an fMRI study.风险决策:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1642-52. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21112.

引用本文的文献

8
Differences between risk perception and risk-taking are related to impulsivity levels.风险认知与冒险行为之间的差异与冲动水平有关。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2022 Sep-Dec;22(3):100318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100318. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

3
Automaticity in social-cognitive processes.社会认知过程中的自动性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Dec;16(12):593-605. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
5
Proactive and reactive control by the medial frontal cortex.内侧前额叶皮质的主动和反应性控制
Front Neuroeng. 2012 Jun 19;5:9. doi: 10.3389/fneng.2012.00009. eCollection 2012.
6
Unconscious goal activation and the hijacking of the executive function.无意识目标激活与执行功能劫持。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Sep;103(3):399-415. doi: 10.1037/a0028955. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
7
8
The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework.认知控制的多变性:双机制框架。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Feb;16(2):106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验