Morrow Daniel G, Weiner Michael, Steinley Douglas, Young James, Murray Michael D
Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and and the Institute of Aviation, Williard Airport, One Airport Road, Q5, MC-394, Savoy, IL 61874 USA.
J Aging Health. 2007 Aug;19(4):575-93. doi: 10.1177/0898264307304448.
We developed a pharmacist-based patient education intervention to improve older adults' adherence to chronic heart failure (CHF) medications, which included written patient-centered instructions. The study evaluated these instructions by examining whether patients preferred them to standard pharmacy instructions.
Elders diagnosed with CHF participated in the randomized controlled trial (83 in the intervention; 153 in usual care control group). Instruction preferences were collected after 6 months of participation.
Patient-centered instructions were preferred for learning about adherence information (e.g., schedule) and standard instructions for learning about drug interactions. Preference for the patient-centered instructions was greater for intervention versus control participants and for participants with lower health literacy. Literacy no longer predicted preferences with patients' cognitive abilities controlled, suggesting literacy reflected more fundamental cognitive mechanisms.
The finding that preferences varied with patients' experience using the instructions and cognitive abilities suggests instructions should accommodate diverse patient needs and abilities.
我们开展了一项以药剂师为主导的患者教育干预措施,以提高老年人对慢性心力衰竭(CHF)药物治疗的依从性,其中包括以患者为中心的书面指导。该研究通过考察患者是否比标准药房指导更青睐这些指导,对其进行了评估。
被诊断为CHF的老年人参与了随机对照试验(干预组83人;常规护理对照组153人)。参与6个月后收集指导偏好情况。
在了解依从性信息(如服药时间表)方面,患者更青睐以患者为中心的指导,而在了解药物相互作用方面,则更倾向于标准指导。干预组参与者相对于对照组参与者,以及健康素养较低的参与者,对以患者为中心的指导的偏好更强。在控制了患者的认知能力后,素养不再能预测偏好情况,这表明素养反映的是更基本的认知机制。
偏好会因患者使用指导的经验和认知能力不同而有所差异,这一发现表明指导应适应患者的多样化需求和能力。