Ellis Michael W, Griffith Matthew E, Dooley David P, McLean Joseph C, Jorgensen James H, Patterson Jan E, Davis Kepler A, Hawley Joshua S, Regules Jason A, Rivard Robert G, Gray Paula J, Ceremuga Julia M, Dejoseph Mary A, Hospenthal Duane R
Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Infectious Disease Service (MCHE-MDI), Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Oct;51(10):3591-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01086-06. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is an emerging pathogen that primarily manifests as uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections. We conducted a cluster randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether targeted intranasal mupirocin therapy in CA-MRSA-colonized soldiers could prevent infection in the treated individual and prevent new colonization and infection within their study groups. We screened 3,447 soldiers comprising 14 training classes for CA-MRSA colonization from January to December 2005. Each training class was randomized to either the mupirocin or placebo study group, and the participants identified as CA-MRSA colonized were treated with either mupirocin or placebo. All participants underwent repeat screening after 8 to 10 weeks and were monitored for 16 weeks for development of infection. Of 3,447 participants screened, 134 (3.9%) were initially colonized with CA-MRSA. Five of 65 (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.0% to 11.4%) placebo-treated participants and 7 of 66 (10.6%; 95% CI, 7.9% to 13.3%) mupirocin-treated participants developed infections; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo- and mupirocin-treated groups was -2.9% (95% CI, -7.5% to 1.7%). Of those not initially colonized with CA-MRSA, 63 of 1,459 (4.3%; 95% CI, 2.7% to 5.9%) of the placebo group and 56 of 1,607 (3.5%; 95% CI, 2.6% to 5.2%) of the mupirocin group developed infections; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo and mupirocin groups was 0.8% (95% CI, -1.0% to 2.7%). Of 3,447 participants, 3,066 (89%) were available for the second sampling and completed follow-up. New CA-MRSA colonization occurred in 24 of 1,459 (1.6%; 95% CI, 0.05% to 2.8%) of the placebo group participants and 23 of 1,607 (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.05% to 2.3%) of the mupirocin group participants; the difference in the infection rate of the placebo and mupirocin groups was 0.2% (95% CI, -1.3% to 1.7%). Despite CA-MRSA eradication in colonized participants, this study showed no decrease in infections in either the mupirocin-treated individuals or within their study group. Furthermore, CA-MRSA eradication did not prevent new colonization within the study group.
社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)是一种新出现的病原体,主要表现为非复杂性皮肤和软组织感染。我们进行了一项整群随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,以确定对CA-MRSA定植的士兵进行靶向鼻内莫匹罗星治疗是否能预防治疗个体的感染,并预防其研究组内的新定植和感染。2005年1月至12月,我们对14个训练班的3447名士兵进行了CA-MRSA定植筛查。每个训练班被随机分为莫匹罗星或安慰剂研究组,被确定为CA-MRSA定植的参与者接受莫匹罗星或安慰剂治疗。所有参与者在8至10周后接受重复筛查,并监测16周以观察感染的发生情况。在3447名接受筛查的参与者中,134人(3.9%)最初被CA-MRSA定植。65名接受安慰剂治疗的参与者中有5人(7.7%;95%置信区间[95%CI],4.0%至11.4%)发生感染,66名接受莫匹罗星治疗的参与者中有7人(10.6%;95%CI,7.9%至13.3%)发生感染;安慰剂组和莫匹罗星组的感染率差异为-2.9%(95%CI,-7.5%至1.7%)。在最初未被CA-MRSA定植的参与者中,安慰剂组1459人中有63人(4.3%;95%CI,2.7%至5.9%)发生感染,莫匹罗星组1607人中有56人(3.5%;95%CI,2.6%至5.2%)发生感染;安慰剂组和莫匹罗星组的感染率差异为0.8%(95%CI,-1.0%至2.7%)。在3447名参与者中,3066人(89%)可进行第二次采样并完成随访。安慰剂组1459名参与者中有24人(1.6%;95%CI,0.05%至2.8%)出现新的CA-MRSA定植,莫匹罗星组1607名参与者中有23人(1.4%;95%CI,0.05%至2.3%)出现新的CA-MRSA定植;安慰剂组和莫匹罗星组的感染率差异为0.2%(95%CI,-1.3%至1.7%)。尽管定植参与者中的CA-MRSA被根除,但本研究表明,莫匹罗星治疗的个体或其研究组内的感染均未减少。此外,CA-MRSA的根除并未预防研究组内的新定植。