• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健诊所中的血糖控制、自我护理行为以及慢性病护理模式的存在情况。

Glucose control, self-care behaviors, and the presence of the chronic care model in primary care clinics.

作者信息

Parchman Michael L, Pugh Jacqueline A, Wang Chen-Pin, Romero Raquel L

机构信息

Department of Family & Community Medicine/University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2007 Nov;30(11):2849-54. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2516. Epub 2007 Aug 6.

DOI:10.2337/dc06-2516
PMID:17682121
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between A1C and the extent to which care delivered to patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care clinics is consistent with the chronic care model (CCM), after controlling for self-care behaviors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, observational study of care provided to 618 patients with type 2 diabetes across 20 small, autonomous primary care clinics in South Texas. Subjects completed an exit survey. The medical record was abstracted for A1C values. Clinicians completed the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) survey, a validated measure of the extent to which care delivered is consistent with the CCM.

RESULTS

There was a significant relationship between ACIC score and A1C, but this relationship varied according to self-care behavior for exercise and was strongest for those who did not adhere to exercise recommendations: for every 1-point increase in ACIC score, A1C was 0.144% lower (P < 0.001). The relationship between ACIC score and A1C for those who adhered to their diet was similar to that for those who did not, after adjusting for exercise, but the overall level of control was better for those who adhered to their diet.

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics of the primary care clinic where one receives care are an important predictor of glucose control. If resources for implementing the CCM are limited, one might want to focus on clinics with low ACIC scores that serve a population of patients who are sedentary because this population may be likely to realize the most benefit from improved glucose control.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是在控制自我护理行为后,探讨糖化血红蛋白(A1C)与基层医疗诊所为2型糖尿病患者提供的护理与慢性病护理模式(CCM)的符合程度之间的关系。

研究设计与方法

这是一项横断面观察性研究,研究对象为南德克萨斯州20家小型独立基层医疗诊所的618例2型糖尿病患者所接受的护理。受试者完成了一份出院调查问卷。提取病历中的A1C值。临床医生完成了慢性病护理评估(ACIC)调查,这是一种验证过的衡量所提供护理与CCM符合程度的方法。

结果

ACIC评分与A1C之间存在显著关系,但这种关系因运动的自我护理行为而异,对于那些未遵循运动建议的患者最为显著:ACIC评分每增加1分,A1C降低0.144%(P<0.001)。在调整运动因素后,坚持饮食的患者的ACIC评分与A1C之间的关系与不坚持饮食的患者相似,但坚持饮食的患者的总体控制水平更好。

结论

接受护理的基层医疗诊所的特征是血糖控制的重要预测因素。如果实施CCM的资源有限,可能需要关注ACIC评分低且服务久坐不动患者群体的诊所,因为这一群体可能最能从改善血糖控制中获益。

相似文献

1
Glucose control, self-care behaviors, and the presence of the chronic care model in primary care clinics.初级保健诊所中的血糖控制、自我护理行为以及慢性病护理模式的存在情况。
Diabetes Care. 2007 Nov;30(11):2849-54. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2516. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
2
Organizational factors associated with self-management behaviors in diabetes primary care clinics.糖尿病初级保健诊所中与自我管理行为相关的组织因素。
Diabetes Educ. 2009 Sep-Oct;35(5):843-50. doi: 10.1177/0145721709342901.
3
Are elements of the chronic care model associated with cardiovascular risk factor control in type 2 diabetes?慢性病照护模式的要素与2型糖尿病患者心血管危险因素的控制有关联吗?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Mar;35(3):133-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35017-5.
4
Risk of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes and the delivery of care consistent with the chronic care model in primary care settings: a STARNet study.2型糖尿病患者的冠状动脉疾病风险以及基层医疗环境中与慢性病护理模式相一致的护理提供情况:一项STARNet研究
Med Care. 2007 Dec;45(12):1129-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318148431e.
5
Association Between Dissatisfaction With Care and Diabetes Self-Care Behaviors, Glycemic Management, and Quality of Life of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.患者对护理的满意度与 2 型糖尿病患者的自我护理行为、血糖管理和生活质量之间的关系。
Diabetes Educ. 2020 Aug;46(4):370-377. doi: 10.1177/0145721720922953.
6
The association between patient-reported self-management behavior, intermediate clinical outcomes, and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: results from the KORA-A study.2 型糖尿病患者报告的自我管理行为、中间临床结局与死亡率之间的关联:来自 KORA-A 研究的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2014 Jun;37(6):1604-12. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2533. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
7
An ecological perspective on diabetes self-care support, self-management behaviors, and hemoglobin A1C among Latinos.拉丁裔人群中糖尿病自我护理支持、自我管理行为与糖化血红蛋白的生态学视角
Diabetes Educ. 2015 Apr;41(2):214-23. doi: 10.1177/0145721715569078. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
8
Self-management behaviors, racial disparities, and glycemic control among adolescents with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病青少年的自我管理行为、种族差异与血糖控制
Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):e912-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1484.
9
Does patient empowerment predict self-care behavior and glycosylated hemoglobin in chinese patients with type 2 diabetes?患者赋权是否能预测中国 2 型糖尿病患者的自我护理行为和糖化血红蛋白?
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 May;17(5):343-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0345. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
10
The importance of relational coordination and reciprocal learning for chronic illness care within primary care teams.初级保健团队中关系协调和相互学习对慢性病护理的重要性。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Jan-Mar;38(1):20-8. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182497262.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating diabetes care inequities: an observational study linking chronic care model's structural elements to process and outcomes of type 2 diabetes care in Belgium.应对糖尿病护理不平等问题:一项观察性研究,将慢性病护理模式的结构要素与比利时2型糖尿病护理的过程和结果相联系。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 20;24(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02372-4.
2
The Effect of Mobile eHealth Education to Improve Knowledge, Skills, Self-Care, and Mobile eHealth Literacies Among Patients With Diabetes: Development and Evaluation Study.移动电子健康教育对提高糖尿病患者知识、技能、自我护理和移动电子健康素养的影响:开发和评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 6;25:e42497. doi: 10.2196/42497.
3
Screening for identification of patients at high risk for diabetes-related foot ulcers: a cross-sectional study.
筛查以识别糖尿病相关足部溃疡高危患者:一项横断面研究。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Mar;50(3):3000605221087815. doi: 10.1177/03000605221087815.
4
Glycemic control outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: chronic care management support of family care team in Thailand.2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制结果:泰国家庭护理团队的慢性病管理支持
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2021 Jul 16;20(2):1269-1279. doi: 10.1007/s40200-021-00851-x. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Relationships Between Mobile eHealth Literacy, Diabetes Self-care, and Glycemic Outcomes in Taiwanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Cross-sectional Study.**标题**:台湾 2 型糖尿病患者的移动电子健康素养、自我护理与血糖控制结局之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 5;9(2):e18404. doi: 10.2196/18404.
6
Effectiveness of the Chronic Care Model in Type 2 Diabetes Management in a Community Health Service Center in China: A Group Randomized Experimental Study.中国社区卫生服务中心应用慢性病管理模式对 2 型糖尿病管理的效果:一项群组随机对照试验研究。
J Diabetes Res. 2019 Jan 3;2019:6516581. doi: 10.1155/2019/6516581. eCollection 2019.
7
Assessing the influence of health systems on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus awareness, treatment, adherence, and control: A systematic review.评估卫生系统对 2 型糖尿病知晓率、治疗率、治疗依从性和控制率的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 29;13(3):e0195086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195086. eCollection 2018.
8
Evaluating Diabetes Care for Patients With Serious Mental Illness Using the Chronic Care Model: A Pilot Study.使用慢性病护理模式评估严重精神疾病患者的糖尿病护理:一项试点研究。
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 6;4:2333392817734206. doi: 10.1177/2333392817734206. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
9
Leveraging quality improvement through use of the Systems Assessment Tool in Indigenous primary health care services: a mixed methods study.通过在原住民初级卫生保健服务中使用系统评估工具来提高质量:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1810-y.
10
Identification, summary and comparison of tools used to measure organizational attributes associated with chronic disease management within primary care settings.识别、总结和比较用于衡量基层医疗环境中与慢性病管理相关的组织属性的工具。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):1072-85. doi: 10.1111/jep.12172. Epub 2014 May 20.