• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型糖尿病患者的冠状动脉疾病风险以及基层医疗环境中与慢性病护理模式相一致的护理提供情况:一项STARNet研究

Risk of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes and the delivery of care consistent with the chronic care model in primary care settings: a STARNet study.

作者信息

Parchman Michael L, Zeber John E, Romero Raquel R, Pugh Jacqueline A

机构信息

Veterans Affairs HSR&D, South Texas Veterans Health Care System (VERDICT), University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229-4404, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2007 Dec;45(12):1129-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318148431e.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318148431e
PMID:18007162
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modifiable risks for coronary heart disease (CHD) in type 2 diabetes include glucose, blood pressure, lipid control, and smoking. The chronic care model (CCM) provides an organizational framework for improving these outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between CHD risk attributable to modifiable risk factors among patients with type 2 diabetes and whether care delivered in primary care settings is consistent with the CCM.

SUBJECTS/METHODS: Approximately 30 patients in each of 20 primary care clinics. CHD risk factors were assessed by patient survey and chart abstraction. Absolute 10-year CHD risk was calculated using the UK Prospective Diabetes Study risk engine. Attributable risk was calculated by setting all 4 modifiable risk factors to guideline indicated values, recalculating the risk, and subtracting it from the absolute risk. In each clinic, the consistency of care with the CCM was evaluated using the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) survey.

RESULTS

Only 15.4% had guideline-recommended control of A1c, blood pressure, and lipids. The absolute 10-year risk CHD was 16.2% (SD 16.6). One-third of this risk, 5.0% (SD 7.4), was attributable to poor risk factor control. After controlling for patient and clinic characteristics, the ACIC score was inversely associated with attributable risk: a 1 point increase in the ACIC score was associated with a 16% (95% CI, 5-26%) relative decrease in attributable risk.

DISCUSSION

The degree to which care delivered in a primary care clinic conforms to the CCM is an important predictor of the 10-year risk of CHD among patients with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病患者冠心病(CHD)的可改变风险因素包括血糖、血压、血脂控制和吸烟。慢性病护理模式(CCM)提供了一个改善这些结果的组织框架。

目的

研究2型糖尿病患者中可改变风险因素所致冠心病风险之间的关系,以及初级保健机构提供的护理是否符合慢性病护理模式。

对象/方法:20家初级保健诊所,每家诊所约30名患者。通过患者调查和病历摘要评估冠心病风险因素。使用英国前瞻性糖尿病研究风险引擎计算10年绝对冠心病风险。通过将所有4个可改变风险因素设定为指南推荐值,重新计算风险,并从绝对风险中减去该风险来计算归因风险。在每家诊所,使用慢性病护理评估(ACIC)调查评估护理与慢性病护理模式的一致性。

结果

只有15.4%的患者的糖化血红蛋白、血压和血脂得到了指南推荐的控制。10年绝对冠心病风险为16.2%(标准差16.6)。其中三分之一的风险,即5.0%(标准差7.4),可归因于风险因素控制不佳。在控制了患者和诊所特征后,ACIC评分与归因风险呈负相关:ACIC评分每增加1分,归因风险相对降低16%(95%CI,5-26%)。

讨论

初级保健诊所提供的护理符合慢性病护理模式的程度是2型糖尿病患者10年冠心病风险的重要预测因素。

相似文献

1
Risk of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes and the delivery of care consistent with the chronic care model in primary care settings: a STARNet study.2型糖尿病患者的冠状动脉疾病风险以及基层医疗环境中与慢性病护理模式相一致的护理提供情况:一项STARNet研究
Med Care. 2007 Dec;45(12):1129-34. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318148431e.
2
Are elements of the chronic care model associated with cardiovascular risk factor control in type 2 diabetes?慢性病照护模式的要素与2型糖尿病患者心血管危险因素的控制有关联吗?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Mar;35(3):133-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35017-5.
3
Glucose control, self-care behaviors, and the presence of the chronic care model in primary care clinics.初级保健诊所中的血糖控制、自我护理行为以及慢性病护理模式的存在情况。
Diabetes Care. 2007 Nov;30(11):2849-54. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2516. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
4
Cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: Attributable risk due to modifiable risk factors.2 型糖尿病患者的心血管疾病:可归因于可改变危险因素的风险。
Can Fam Physician. 2010 Aug;56(8):e302-7.
5
Management outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: targeting the 10-year absolute risk of coronary heart disease.2型糖尿病患者的管理结局:以冠心病10年绝对风险为目标
Med J Aust. 2007 Jun 18;186(12):622-4. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01078.x.
6
Effectiveness of a self-management intervention with personalised genetic and lifestyle-related risk information on coronary heart disease and diabetes-related risk in type 2 diabetes (CoRDia): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对2型糖尿病患者冠心病和糖尿病相关风险的自我管理干预措施,结合个性化遗传和生活方式相关风险信息的效果(CoRDia):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Dec 2;16:547. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1073-7.
7
The stories beneath.背后的故事。
Med Care. 2007 Dec;45(12):1123-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815d18e6.
8
The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56).英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)风险评估模型:II型糖尿病患者冠心病风险预测模型(UKPDS 56)
Clin Sci (Lond). 2001 Dec;101(6):671-9.
9
A pen-and-paper coronary risk estimator for office use with patients with type 2 diabetes.一种供办公室使用的、适用于2型糖尿病患者的纸笔式冠心病风险评估工具。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 May;81(5):632-6. doi: 10.4065/81.5.632.
10
Recalculation of cardiovascular risk score as a surrogate marker of change in clinical care of diabetes patients: the Alphabet POEM project (Practice Of Evidence-based Medicine).重新计算心血管风险评分作为糖尿病患者临床护理变化的替代指标:字母表POEM项目(循证医学实践)
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 May;20(5):765-72. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003539.

引用本文的文献

1
Intersectoral health interventions to improve the well-being of people living with type 2 diabetes: a scoping review protocol.跨部门卫生干预措施改善 2 型糖尿病患者的健康状况:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 21;14(5):e080659. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080659.
2
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.改善人群健康与照护:2023 年糖尿病照护标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Supple 1):S10-S18. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S001.
3
Quality of Diabetes Care in the USA.美国的糖尿病护理质量。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Jun 3;23(7):73. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01503-5.
4
1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: -.改善人群的医疗服务和促进健康:-。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S7-S13. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S001.
5
Effectiveness of the Chronic Care Model in Type 2 Diabetes Management in a Community Health Service Center in China: A Group Randomized Experimental Study.中国社区卫生服务中心应用慢性病管理模式对 2 型糖尿病管理的效果:一项群组随机对照试验研究。
J Diabetes Res. 2019 Jan 3;2019:6516581. doi: 10.1155/2019/6516581. eCollection 2019.
6
Quality of perinatal depression care in primary care setting in Nigeria.尼日利亚初级保健机构中围产期抑郁症护理的质量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 22;18(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3716-3.
7
Improving comprehensive care for patients with diabetes.改善糖尿病患者的综合护理。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Oct 15;7(4):e000101. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000101. eCollection 2018.
8
Evaluating Diabetes Care for Patients With Serious Mental Illness Using the Chronic Care Model: A Pilot Study.使用慢性病护理模式评估严重精神疾病患者的糖尿病护理:一项试点研究。
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 6;4:2333392817734206. doi: 10.1177/2333392817734206. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
9
Improved Blood Pressure Control to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Morbidity and Mortality: The Standardized Hypertension Treatment and Prevention Project.改善血压控制以降低心血管疾病发病率和死亡率:标准化高血压治疗与预防项目
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Dec;18(12):1284-1294. doi: 10.1111/jch.12861. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
10
A tool for tracking and assessing chronic illness care in prison (ACIC-P).一种用于跟踪和评估监狱慢性病护理的工具(ACIC-P)。
J Correct Health Care. 2014 Oct;20(4):313-33. doi: 10.1177/1078345814541531. Epub 2014 Aug 12.