Loureiro João, Rodriguez Eleazar, Dolezel Jaroslav, Santos Conceição
Laboratory of Biotechnology and Cytomics, CESAM and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Ann Bot. 2007 Oct;100(4):875-88. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm152. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
After the initial boom in the application of flow cytometry in plant sciences in the late 1980s and early 1990s, which was accompanied by development of many nuclear isolation buffers, only a few efforts were made to develop new buffer formulas. In this work, recent data on the performance of nuclear isolation buffers are utilized in order to develop new buffers, general purpose buffer (GPB) and woody plant buffer (WPB), for plant DNA flow cytometry.
GPB and WPB were used to prepare samples for flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in a set of 37 plant species that included herbaceous and woody taxa with leaf tissues differing in structure and chemical composition. The following parameters of isolated nuclei were assessed: forward and side light scatter, propidium iodide fluorescence, coefficient of variation of DNA peaks, quantity of debris background, and the number of particles released from sample tissue. The nuclear genome size of 30 selected species was also estimated using the buffer that performed better for a given species.
In unproblematic species, the use of both buffers resulted in high quality samples. The analysis of samples obtained with GPB usually resulted in histograms of DNA content with higher or similar resolution than those prepared with the WPB. In more recalcitrant tissues, such as those from woody plants, WPB performed better and GPB failed to provide acceptable results in some cases. Improved resolution of DNA content histograms in comparison with previously published buffers was achieved in most of the species analysed.
WPB is a reliable buffer which is also suitable for the analysis of problematic tissues/species. Although GPB failed with some plant species, it provided high-quality DNA histograms in species from which nuclear suspensions are easy to prepare. The results indicate that even with a broad range of species, either GPB or WPB is suitable for preparation of high-quality suspensions of intact nuclei suitable for DNA flow cytometry.
在20世纪80年代末和90年代初流式细胞术在植物科学中的应用首次蓬勃发展并伴随着许多细胞核分离缓冲液的开发之后,为开发新的缓冲液配方所做的努力很少。在这项工作中,利用关于细胞核分离缓冲液性能的最新数据来开发用于植物DNA流式细胞术的新缓冲液,即通用缓冲液(GPB)和木本植物缓冲液(WPB)。
使用GPB和WPB为一组37种植物的细胞核DNA含量的流式细胞术分析制备样品,这些植物包括草本和木本分类群,其叶片组织在结构和化学成分上有所不同。评估分离细胞核的以下参数:前向和侧向光散射、碘化丙啶荧光、DNA峰的变异系数、碎片背景量以及从样品组织中释放的颗粒数量。还使用对给定物种表现更好的缓冲液估计了30个选定物种的核基因组大小。
在没有问题的物种中,使用这两种缓冲液都能得到高质量的样品。用GPB获得的样品分析通常产生比用WPB制备的DNA含量直方图分辨率更高或相似的直方图。在更难处理的组织中,如来自木本植物的组织,WPB表现更好,而GPB在某些情况下未能提供可接受的结果。在大多数分析的物种中,与先前发表的缓冲液相比,DNA含量直方图的分辨率有所提高。
WPB是一种可靠的缓冲液,也适用于有问题的组织/物种的分析。尽管GPB对某些植物物种不适用,但它在易于制备核悬浮液的物种中提供了高质量的DNA直方图。结果表明,即使对于广泛的物种,GPB或WPB都适用于制备适用于DNA流式细胞术的完整细胞核的高质量悬浮液。