Suppr超能文献

发展中国家的烟草控制经济政策。

Economic policies for tobacco control in developing countries.

作者信息

Ross H, Chaloupka F J

机构信息

International Research Triangle Institute, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Salud Publica Mex. 2006;48 Suppl 1:S113-20. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342006000700014.

Abstract

Raising tobacco taxes can have an income distributional impact on the population. Since lower socio-economic groups usually smoke more, they also contribute more to total cigarette tax collection. Thus, those who can afford it least contribute the most in terms of tobacco taxes. This means that tobacco taxes are regressive. However, tobacco tax increases are likely to be progressive, decreasing the relative tax incidence on the poor, vis-à-vis the rich. This is based on the premise that the poor are likely to be more sensitive to price changes, and would thus reduce their cigarette consumption by a greater percentage than the rich in response to an excise tax-induced increase in cigarette prices. Recent empirical studies confirm this hypothesis by demonstrating that the price responsiveness of cigarette demand increases with income. Research in China confirmed that reducing cigarette expenditures could release household resources for spending on food, housing, and other goods that improve living standards. Therefore, in the long run, tobacco control measures will reduce social inequality.

摘要

提高烟草税会对人群产生收入分配影响。由于社会经济地位较低的群体通常吸烟更多,他们对香烟总税收的贡献也更大。因此,那些最无力承担的人在烟草税方面贡献最大。这意味着烟草税具有累退性。然而,提高烟草税可能具有累进性,相对于富人而言,降低了穷人的相对税负。这是基于这样一个前提,即穷人可能对价格变化更为敏感,因此在消费税导致香烟价格上涨时,他们减少香烟消费的百分比会高于富人。最近的实证研究通过证明香烟需求的价格反应性随收入增加而提高,证实了这一假设。中国的研究证实,减少香烟支出可以释放家庭资源,用于食品、住房和其他改善生活水平的商品支出。因此,从长远来看,控烟措施将减少社会不平等。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验