Suppr超能文献

公共财政与产品多样性下的烟草税:以塞内加尔和尼日利亚为例的理论与应用

Public finances and tobacco taxation with product variety: Theory and application to Senegal and Nigeria.

机构信息

University Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, IRD, CERDI, Clermont, France.

United Nations University (UNU-MERIT), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Feb 14;14(2):e0212015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212015. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

This study endeavors to answer two questions: which category of excise taxes is more appropriate for Senegal and Nigeria and which consequences an increase of the tobacco taxes would have on the price, the demand and the tax revenues in each one of the two countries? To answer these questions, we adopt a double approach: first, a theoretical model of taxation with variety; and second, a simulation model to answer the second question. The results of the theoretical model indicate that, in the context of excise taxation, the number of products variety-or that of cigarette brands-directly affects both the degree of market concentration and the marginal effects of specific and ad valorem excise taxes on the price of tobacco. In addition, the comparison of the marginal effects of ad valorem and specific excise taxes depends on the marginal costs of production of different varieties weighted by the tax rates and the number of varieties. Our empirical results first show that the specific excise taxes are more adapted to Senegal while ad valorem excise taxes fit best Nigeria. This result crucially matters for the excise taxes are exclusively of an ad valorem nature in both Senegal and Nigeria. It is perfectly possible to envisage a situation where the two main forms of excise taxes could co-exist. It also appears from our results that tax development does not have the same implications for the two countries. Increasing tobacco taxes in Senegal strongly reduces the demand, but also induces a decrease in the tax revenues, while this will imply a lesser decline in demand in Nigeria accompanied however by a sharp increase of the country's tax revenues. This difference stems from the fact that the price-elasticity of tobacco demand is very high in Senegal, contrary to Nigeria. Finally, it is important to mention that there is a specific threshold beyond which the tax increases cease to have a positive effect on tax revenues in Nigeria.

摘要

本研究旨在回答两个问题

对塞内加尔和尼日利亚而言,哪种消费税类别更为合适,以及提高烟草税对两国烟草价格、需求和税收收入的影响?为回答这些问题,我们采用了双重方法:首先是一个具有多样性的税收理论模型,其次是一个模拟模型来回答第二个问题。理论模型的结果表明,在消费税的背景下,产品种类的数量——即香烟品牌的数量——直接影响市场集中程度和从价税和从量税对烟草价格的边际效应。此外,从价税和从量税的边际效应的比较取决于不同品种的边际生产成本乘以税率和品种数量。我们的实证结果首先表明,从量消费税更适合塞内加尔,而从价消费税最适合尼日利亚。这一结果对塞内加尔和尼日利亚的消费税完全是从价税的性质至关重要。完全可以设想两种主要形式的消费税同时存在的情况。我们的结果还表明,税收发展对两国的影响并不相同。在塞内加尔提高烟草税会强烈减少需求,但也会导致税收收入下降,而在尼日利亚,这种情况会导致需求下降幅度较小,但同时会导致该国税收收入大幅增加。这种差异源于塞内加尔烟草需求的价格弹性非常高,而尼日利亚则相反。最后,需要指出的是,在尼日利亚,存在一个特定的阈值,超过这个阈值,税收增加对税收收入就不再有积极影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验