• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据卡诺夫斯基和东部肿瘤协作组量表评估癌症患者体能状态时观察者内和观察者间的变异性。

Intra and interobserver variability in cancer patients' performance status assessed according to Karnofsky and ECOG scales.

作者信息

Roila F, Lupattelli M, Sassi M, Basurto C, Bracarda S, Picciafuoco M, Boschetti E, Milella G, Ballatori E, Tonato M

机构信息

Medical Oncology Division, Policlinico Hospital, Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 1991 Jun;2(6):437-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057981.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057981
PMID:1768630
Abstract

The Karnofsky (K) and ECOG (E) performance status (PS) scales are widely used to evaluate the functional status of cancer patients to determine their eligibility for clinical trials and their prognosis, but knowledge of inter and intraobserver variability of these scales is scarse. We therefore planned a prospective study on 209 consecutive cancer patients to evaluate this critical point. Two independent observers evaluated the KPS and EPS of each patient by interviewing them on the same day. After their interviews the patients were asked to fill in, again on the same day, a self-evaluation scale concerning their ability to perform the routine activities of daily life. The 209 patient self-evaluation scales were presented twice, randomly and blinded, to the two observers who had participated in the evaluation of PS as well as to one other observer who had not. The interobserver correlation for both scales was very high (K = 0.921 for KPS and K = 0.914 for EPS) as was the intraobserver correlation (for KPS: K = 0.993, K = 0.960, and K = 0.959 and, respectively, for EPS: K = 0.982, K = 0.970, and K = 0.920). On the basis of these results, it appears that evaluation of PS made by a clinical oncologist using K or E scales can be very reliable and is a guarantee of optimal selection of cancer patients for inclusion in clinical trials.

摘要

卡诺夫斯基(K)和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)的体能状态(PS)量表被广泛用于评估癌症患者的功能状态,以确定他们是否适合参加临床试验及其预后,但关于这些量表在观察者间和观察者内的变异性的了解却很少。因此,我们计划对209例连续的癌症患者进行一项前瞻性研究,以评估这一关键点。两名独立的观察者在同一天通过访谈对每位患者的KPS和EPS进行评估。访谈后,要求患者在同一天再次填写一份关于他们进行日常生活常规活动能力的自我评估量表。将209份患者自我评估量表随机且盲法地呈现给参与PS评估的两名观察者以及另一名未参与的观察者两次。两个量表的观察者间相关性都非常高(KPS的K = 0.921,EPS的K = 0.914),观察者内相关性也是如此(对于KPS:K = 0.993、K = 0.960和K = 0.959,对于EPS分别为:K = 0.982、K = 0.970和K = 0.920)。基于这些结果,看来临床肿瘤学家使用K或E量表对PS进行的评估可能非常可靠,并且是为临床试验选择最佳癌症患者的保证。

相似文献

1
Intra and interobserver variability in cancer patients' performance status assessed according to Karnofsky and ECOG scales.根据卡诺夫斯基和东部肿瘤协作组量表评估癌症患者体能状态时观察者内和观察者间的变异性。
Ann Oncol. 1991 Jun;2(6):437-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a057981.
2
Observer error in grading performance status in cancer patients.癌症患者体能状态分级中的观察者误差。
Support Care Cancer. 1999 Sep;7(5):332-5. doi: 10.1007/s005200050271.
3
The Functionality Assessment Flowchart (FAF): a new simple and reliable method to measure performance status with a high percentage of agreement between observers.功能评估流程图(FAF):一种新的简单可靠的方法,用于测量功能状态,观察者之间的一致性百分比很高。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Jul 5;15:501. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1526-0.
4
Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution.卡诺夫斯基和东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分在肺癌中的应用:一项对来自单一机构的536例患者的前瞻性纵向研究。
Eur J Cancer. 1996 Jun;32A(7):1135-41. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00664-8.
5
Performance status assessment in cancer patients.癌症患者的体能状态评估
Cancer. 1990 Apr 15;65(8):1864-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900415)65:8<1864::aid-cncr2820650832>3.0.co;2-u.
6
Simple prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer based on performance status.基于体能状态的晚期癌症患者简易预后模型
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Sep;10(5):e335-41. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001457. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
7
Performance status assessment in cancer patients. An inter-observer variability study.癌症患者的体能状态评估。一项观察者间变异性研究。
Br J Cancer. 1993 Apr;67(4):773-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.140.
8
Inter- and Intraobserver Reliabilities of Four Different Radiographic Grading Scales of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Joint.膝关节骨关节炎四种不同影像学分级量表的观察者间及观察者内可靠性
J Knee Surg. 2018 Mar;31(3):247-253. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1602249. Epub 2017 May 1.
9
Performance status and survival in cancer patients undergoing palliative care: retrospective study.接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的体能状态与生存情况:回顾性研究
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Aug 10. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003562.
10
Conversion of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) to Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), and the interchangeability of PPS and KPS in prognostic tools.将卡氏功能状态评分(KPS)和东部肿瘤协作组功能状态评分(ECOG)转换为姑息治疗功能状态量表(PPS),以及PPS与KPS在预后工具中的互换性。
J Palliat Care. 2013 Autumn;29(3):163-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for early mortality among patients with gastrointestinal malignancy in the C-CAT database.C-CAT数据库中胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者早期死亡的危险因素。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s10147-025-02802-5.
2
Allogeneic Transplantation for Older Adults.老年人的异体移植
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2025;1475:9-40. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-84988-6_2.
3
Predicting 30-day mortality in older patients with suspected infections by adding performance status to quick sequential organ failure assessment.通过在快速序贯器官衰竭评估中加入体能状态来预测疑似感染老年患者的30天死亡率。
J Gen Fam Med. 2025 Feb 5;26(3):238-245. doi: 10.1002/jgf2.764. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Leveraging real-world data to predict cancer cachexia stage, quality of life, and survival in a racially and ethnically diverse multi-institutional cohort of treatment-naïve patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.利用真实世界数据预测初治胰腺导管腺癌患者种族和民族多样化的多机构队列中的癌症恶病质阶段、生活质量和生存率。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 23;14:1362244. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1362244. eCollection 2024.
5
Supplementary Contribution of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status to Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in the Detection of Bacteremia Among Older Patients With Suspected Infections.东部肿瘤协作组体能状态对快速序贯器官衰竭评估在疑似感染老年患者菌血症检测中的补充作用。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 27;16(2):e55086. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55086. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Enhancing the Adult and Paediatric Palliative Care System: Spanish Professionals' and Family Caregivers' Suggestions for Comprehensive Improvement.加强成人和儿童姑息治疗体系:西班牙专业人员及家庭护理人员提出的全面改进建议
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Dec 27;12(1):65. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010065.
7
Predicting Risk of Severe Toxicity and Early Death in Older Adult Patients Treated with Chemotherapy.预测老年化疗患者严重毒性反应及早期死亡风险
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 21;15(18):4670. doi: 10.3390/cancers15184670.
8
Exploring preferences of different modes of administration of hypomethylating agent treatments among patients with acute myeloid leukemia.探索急性髓系白血病患者对去甲基化药物不同给药方式的偏好。
Front Oncol. 2023 May 8;13:1160966. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1160966. eCollection 2023.
9
Validation and discussion of clinical practicability of the 2022 graded prognostic assessment for NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases in a routine clinical cohort.2022年非小细胞肺癌腺癌脑转移患者分级预后评估在常规临床队列中的临床实用性验证与讨论
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 20;13:1042548. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1042548. eCollection 2023.
10
Chemoradiotherapy in geriatric patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: Multi-center analysis on the value of standard treatment in the elderly.老年食管鳞状细胞癌患者的放化疗:老年患者标准治疗价值的多中心分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 3;13:1063670. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1063670. eCollection 2023.