Jansson Catarina, Nordenstedt Helena, Johansson Saga, Wallander Mari-Ann, Johnsen Roar, Hveem Kristian, Lagergren Jesper
Unit of Esophageal and Gastric Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;5(9):1029-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.009. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux constitutes a major public health problem in the Western world. Few population-based studies have addressed socioeconomic factors in relation to reflux.
We conducted a case-control study based on 2 health surveys performed in the Norwegian county of Nord-Trondelag in 1984-1986 and 1995-1997, respectively. Reflux was assessed in the second survey, comprising 65,333 participants representing 70% of the county's adult population. Among 58,596 persons responding to questions regarding reflux symptoms, 3153 persons reporting severe symptoms represented the cases, and 40,210 persons without symptoms represented the controls. Data collected in questionnaires included socioeconomic status (SES) based on occupation, education, and material deprivation; family situation; and potential confounders. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from unconditional logistic regression in crude models and models adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and body mass.
The risk of reflux increased with decreasing levels of SES based on occupation, education, and material deprivation. Increased risks of reflux were seen among unskilled laborers (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0), skilled laborers (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), and self-employed and farmers (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6). A 1.9-fold (95% CI, 1.7-2.2) increased risk of reflux was observed among persons with low education, compared with highly educated persons. Reflux was more common among materially deprived persons (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.9-4.1). The results were similar in crude and adjusted models.
This large population-based study reveals a link between low SES and reflux symptoms that is not explained by the known risk factors of smoking or obesity. This finding deserves further research.
胃食管反流是西方世界的一个主要公共卫生问题。很少有基于人群的研究探讨与反流相关的社会经济因素。
我们基于分别于1984 - 1986年和1995 - 1997年在挪威北特伦德拉格郡进行的两项健康调查开展了一项病例对照研究。在第二项调查中评估反流情况,该调查有65333名参与者,占该郡成年人口的70%。在58596名回答了反流症状相关问题的人中,3153名报告有严重症状的人作为病例,40210名无症状的人作为对照。问卷收集的数据包括基于职业、教育和物质匮乏程度的社会经济地位(SES);家庭状况;以及潜在混杂因素。在粗模型和经年龄、性别、吸烟和体重调整的模型中,通过无条件逻辑回归估计比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。
基于职业、教育和物质匮乏程度,反流风险随SES水平降低而增加。非技术工人(OR,1.6;95% CI,1.3 - 2.0)、技术工人(OR,1.4;95% CI,1.1 - 1.7)以及个体经营者和农民(OR,1.3;95% CI,1.1 - 1.6)中反流风险增加。与高学历者相比,低学历者反流风险增加1.9倍(95% CI,1.7 - 2.2)。物质匮乏者中反流更常见(OR,3.4;95% CI,2.9 - 第1页4.1)。粗模型和调整模型的结果相似。
这项基于大量人群的研究揭示了低SES与反流症状之间的联系,这无法用吸烟或肥胖等已知风险因素来解释。这一发现值得进一步研究。