Jansson C, Nordenstedt H, Wallander M-A, Johansson S, Johnsen R, Hveem K, Lagergren J
Unit of Esophageal and Gastric Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Sep 1;26(5):683-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03411.x.
The association between psychiatric disorders and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms is uncertain, and few population-based studies are available.
To examine the association between psychiatric and psychological factors and reflux symptoms.
Population-based, cross-sectional, case-control study based on two health surveys conducted in the Norwegian county Nord-Trondelag in 1984-1986 and 1995-1997. Reflux symptoms were assessed in the second survey, including 65,333 participants (70% of the county's adult population). 3153 subjects reporting severe reflux symptoms were defined as cases and 40,210 subjects without symptoms were defined as controls. Data were collected in questionnaires. Odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using unconditional logistic regression, in adjusted models.
Subjects reporting anxiety without depression had a 3.2-fold (95% CI: 2.7-3.8) increased risk of reflux, subjects with depression without anxiety had a 1.7-fold (95% CI: 1.4-2.1) increased risk and subjects with both anxiety and depression had a 2.8-fold (95% CI: 2.4-3.2) increased risk, compared to subjects without anxiety/depression. We observed a weak inverse association between one measure of covert coping and risk of reflux and a weak positive association between another coping measure and risk of reflux.
This population-based study indicates that anxiety and depression are strongly associated with reflux symptoms, while no consistent association regarding coping and reflux was found.
精神疾病与胃食管反流症状之间的关联尚不确定,且基于人群的研究较少。
研究精神和心理因素与反流症状之间的关联。
基于1984 - 1986年和1995 - 1997年在挪威北特伦德拉格郡进行的两项健康调查开展基于人群的横断面病例对照研究。在第二次调查中评估反流症状,包括65333名参与者(占该郡成年人口的70%)。3153名报告有严重反流症状的受试者被定义为病例,40210名无症状受试者被定义为对照。通过问卷调查收集数据。在调整模型中,使用无条件逻辑回归估计比值比及95%置信区间。
与无焦虑/抑郁的受试者相比,报告有焦虑但无抑郁的受试者反流风险增加3.2倍(95%置信区间:2.7 - 3.8),有抑郁但无焦虑的受试者反流风险增加1.7倍(95%置信区间:1.4 - 2.1),既有焦虑又有抑郁的受试者反流风险增加2.8倍(95%置信区间:2.4 - 3.2)。我们观察到一种隐蔽应对方式的测量与反流风险之间存在弱的负相关,另一种应对方式的测量与反流风险之间存在弱的正相关。
这项基于人群的研究表明,焦虑和抑郁与反流症状密切相关,而未发现应对方式与反流之间存在一致的关联。