Bond Gary D
Department of Social Sciences, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USA.
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Aug;32(4):339-51. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9110-z. Epub 2007 Aug 10.
A lively debate between Bond and Uysal (2007, Law and Human Behavior, 31, 109-115) and O'Sullivan (2007, Law and Human Behavior, 31, 117-123) concerns whether there are experts in deception detection. Two experiments sought to (a) identify expert(s) in detection and assess them twice with four tests, and (b) study their detection behavior using eye tracking. Paroled felons produced videotaped statements that were presented to students and law enforcement personnel. Two experts were identified, both female Native American BIA correctional officers. Experts were over 80% accurate in the first assessment, and scored at 90% accuracy in the second assessment. In Signal Detection analyses, experts showed high discrimination, and did not evidence biased responding. They exploited nonverbal cues to make fast, accurate decisions. These highly-accurate individuals can be characterized as experts in deception detection.
邦德与于萨尔（2007年，《法律与人类行为》，第31卷，第109 - 115页）和奥沙利文（2007年，《法律与人类行为》，第31卷，第117 - 123页）之间展开了一场热烈的辩论，主题是是否存在测谎专家。两项实验旨在：（a）识别测谎专家并用四项测试对他们进行两次评估，以及（b）使用眼动追踪技术研究他们的测谎行为。获假释的重罪犯录制了视频陈述，这些陈述被展示给学生和执法人员。确定了两名专家，她们都是美国印第安事务局的女性惩教官员。专家在首次评估中的准确率超过80%，在第二次评估中的准确率达到90%。在信号检测分析中，专家表现出高度的辨别力，且没有证据表明存在偏差反应。他们利用非语言线索做出快速、准确的决策。这些高准确率的人可被视为测谎专家。
