Brown Sydney E S, Chin Marshall H, Huang Elbert S
Section of General Internal Medicine and the Diabetes Research and Training Center, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):248-51. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019232.
Outpatient healthcare organisations worldwide participate in quality improvement (QI) programmes. Despite the importance of understanding the financial impact of such programmes, there are no established standard methods for empirically assessing QI programme costs and their consequences for small outpatient healthcare organisations.
The costs and cost consequences were evaluated for a diabetes QI programme implemented throughout the USA in federally qualified community health centres. For five case study centres, survey instruments and methods for data analysis were developed.
Two types of cost/revenue were evaluated. Direct costs/revenues, such as personnel time, items purchased and grants received, were evaluated using self-administered surveys. Cost/revenue consequences, which were cost/revenue changes that may have occurred due to changes in patient utilisation or physician behaviour, were evaluated using electronic billing data. Other methods for evaluating cost/revenue consequences if electronic billing data are not available are also discussed.
This paper describes a practical taxonomy and method for assessing the costs and revenues of QI programmes for outpatient organisations. Results of such analyses will be useful for healthcare organisations implementing QI programmes and also for policy makers designing incentives for QI participation.
全球范围内的门诊医疗组织都参与质量改进(QI)项目。尽管了解此类项目的财务影响很重要,但目前尚无既定的标准方法来实证评估QI项目的成本及其对小型门诊医疗组织的影响。
对美国各地联邦合格社区健康中心实施的糖尿病QI项目的成本及成本影响进行评估。针对五个案例研究中心,开发了调查工具和数据分析方法。
评估了两种类型的成本/收入。直接成本/收入,如人员时间、采购物品和获得的补助金,通过自行填写的调查问卷进行评估。成本/收入影响,即可能因患者利用率或医生行为变化而发生的成本/收入变化,使用电子计费数据进行评估。还讨论了在没有电子计费数据的情况下评估成本/收入影响的其他方法。
本文描述了一种实用的分类法和方法,用于评估门诊组织QI项目的成本和收入。此类分析结果将有助于实施QI项目的医疗组织,也有助于为鼓励参与QI项目而设计激励措施的政策制定者。