Suppr超能文献

改善糖尿病护理的成本后果:社区卫生中心的经验

The cost consequences of improving diabetes care: the community health center experience.

作者信息

Huang Elbert S, Brown Sydney E S, Zhang James X, Kirchhoff Anne C, Schaefer Cynthia T, Casalino Lawrence P, Chin Marshall H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Mar;34(3):138-46. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34016-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite significant interest in the business case for quality improvement (QI), there are few evaluations of the impact of QI programs on outpatient organizations. The financial impact of the Health Disparities Collaboratives (HDC), a national QI program conducted in community health centers (HCs), was examined.

METHODS

Chief executive officers (CEOs) from health centers in two U.S. regions that participated in the Diabetes HDC (N = 74) were surveyed. In case studies of five selected centers, program costs/revenues, clinical costs/revenues, overall center financial health, and indirect costs/benefits were assessed.

RESULTS

CEOs were divided on the HDC's overall effect on finances (38%, worsened; 48%, no change; 14%, improved). Case studies showed that the HDC represented a new administrative cost ($6-$22/patient, year 1) without a regular revenue source. In centers with billing data, the balance of diabetes-related clinical costs/revenues and payor mix did not clearly worsen or improve with the program's start. The most commonly mentioned indirect benefits were improved chronic illness care and enhanced staff morale.

DISCUSSION

CEO perceptions of the overall financial impact of the HDC vary widely; the case studies illustrate the numerous factors that may influence these perceptions. Whether the identified balance of costs and benefits is generalizable or sustainable will have to be addressed to optimally design financial reimbursement and incentives.

摘要

背景

尽管人们对质量改进(QI)的商业案例有着浓厚兴趣,但对QI项目对门诊机构影响的评估却很少。本研究考察了社区卫生中心(HC)开展的一项全国性QI项目——健康差异协作项目(HDC)的财务影响。

方法

对美国两个地区参与糖尿病HDC的卫生中心的首席执行官(CEO)进行了调查(N = 74)。在对五个选定中心的案例研究中,评估了项目成本/收入、临床成本/收入、中心整体财务状况以及间接成本/收益。

结果

CEO们对HDC对财务的总体影响看法不一(38%认为恶化;48%认为无变化;14%认为改善)。案例研究表明,HDC带来了新的管理成本(第1年为每位患者6 - 22美元),且没有常规收入来源。在有计费数据的中心,随着项目启动,与糖尿病相关临床成本/收入的平衡以及付款人组合并未明显恶化或改善。最常提到的间接收益是慢性病护理改善和员工士气提高。

讨论

CEO们对HDC总体财务影响的看法差异很大;案例研究说明了可能影响这些看法的众多因素。为了优化设计财务报销和激励措施,必须解决所确定的成本效益平衡是否具有普遍性或可持续性的问题。

相似文献

1
The cost consequences of improving diabetes care: the community health center experience.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Mar;34(3):138-46. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34016-1.
3
The perceived financial impact of quality improvement efforts in community health centers.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Apr-Jun;31(2):111-9. doi: 10.1097/01.JAC.0000314701.50042.0b.
4
Estimating costs of quality improvement for outpatient healthcare organisations: a practical methodology.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):248-51. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019232.
6
The cost-effectiveness of improving diabetes care in U.S. federally qualified community health centers.
Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec;42(6 Pt 1):2174-93; discussion 2294-323. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00734.x.
7
8
Impact of health disparities collaboratives on racial/ethnic and insurance disparities in US community health centers.
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Feb 8;170(3):279-86. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.493.
9
Predicting changes in staff morale and burnout at community health centers participating in the health disparities collaboratives.
Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug;43(4):1403-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00828.x. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
10
Quality improvement implementation and disparities: the case of the health disparities collaboratives.
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49 Suppl:S65-71. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31823ea0da.

引用本文的文献

4
The Costs of Participating in a Diabetes Quality Improvement Collaborative: Variation Among Five Clinics.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Jan;42(1):18-25. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42002-7.
5
National Strategies to Decrease the Burden of Diabetes and Its Complications.
Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Sep;15(9):65. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0637-y.
7
Combating Obesity at Community Health Centers (COACH): a quality improvement collaborative for weight management programs.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013;24(2 Suppl):47-60. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0101.
8
A roadmap and best practices for organizations to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):992-1000. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2082-9.

本文引用的文献

2
What do we know about financial returns on investments in patient safety? A literature review.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Dec;31(12):690-9. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31090-7.
3
Cost-effectiveness of full medicare coverage of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for beneficiaries with diabetes.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jul 19;143(2):89-99. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-2-200507190-00007.
4
The insufficiency of evidence to establish the business case for quality.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Aug;17(4):347-55. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi034. Epub 2005 Mar 23.
6
The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):17-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.17.
7
Markets and medicine: barriers to creating a "business case for quality".
Perspect Biol Med. 2003 Winter;46(1):38-51; discussion 52-4. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2003.0001.
8
Making the business case for patient safety.
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Jan;29(1):51-4, 1. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29007-9.
9
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1909-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1909.
10
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness.
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验