Suppr超能文献

门诊“短程”全身麻醉下接受拔牙手术的小儿患者围手术期局部麻醉。一项双盲随机对照试验。

Perioperative local anaesthetic in young paediatric patients undergoing extractions under outpatient 'short-case' general anaesthesia. A double-blind randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Leong K J, Roberts G J, Ashley P F

机构信息

MClinDent (Paediatric Dentistry) Graduate, Unit of Paediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute and Hospital, University College London, University of London, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London, WC1X 8LD.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2007 Sep 22;203(6):E11; discussion 334-5. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.724. Epub 2007 Aug 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if postoperative pain/discomfort and anxiety experienced by young children who had extractions under general anaesthesia (GA) were affected by perioperative injection techniques of local anaesthetic (LA).

DESIGN

A single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Conducted in 2002/2003 at the Unit of Paediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Hospital, London.

METHODS

Children, aged 2-6 years scheduled for extractions under GA, were randomly assigned to receive either no LA (NLA), infiltration injection (IFL) or intraligamental injection (ITR) perioperatively. All children received analgesic suppositories after induction.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Anxiety was scored using the Venham Picture Scale. Postoperative pain was scored using the Simplified Toddler-Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale and supplemented with the Modified Pain/Discomfort Scale.

RESULTS

Eighteen children received NLA, 17 received IFL and 19 received ITR. Postoperative pain/discomfort and anxiety scores were not significantly different during the period of recovery. On the first night, the intraligamental group had significantly lower pain scores (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative pain/discomfort and anxiety during the period of recovery experienced by young children who had extractions under GA appear not to be affected by perioperative injection techniques of LA. Upon discharge, intraligamental injection appears beneficial, as it is probably well tolerated by causing less soft tissue numbness initially and thus, reduces perceived pain/discomfort.

摘要

目的

探讨全身麻醉(GA)下拔牙的幼儿术后疼痛/不适及焦虑是否受局部麻醉药(LA)围手术期注射技术的影响。

设计

单中心、双盲、随机对照试验。

地点

2002/2003年在伦敦伊斯特曼牙科医院儿童牙科病房进行。

方法

计划在GA下拔牙的2至6岁儿童被随机分配在围手术期接受无LA(NLA)、浸润注射(IFL)或韧带内注射(ITR)。所有儿童在诱导后接受镇痛栓剂。

观察指标

使用韦纳姆图片量表对焦虑进行评分。使用简化的幼儿学龄前术后疼痛量表对术后疼痛进行评分,并辅以改良疼痛/不适量表。

结果

18名儿童接受NLA,17名接受IFL,19名接受ITR。恢复期间术后疼痛/不适和焦虑评分无显著差异。在第一个晚上,韧带内注射组的疼痛评分显著较低(p = 0.012)。

结论

GA下拔牙的幼儿在恢复期间的术后疼痛/不适和焦虑似乎不受LA围手术期注射技术的影响。出院时,韧带内注射似乎有益,因为它可能耐受性良好,最初引起的软组织麻木较少,从而减轻了感知到的疼痛/不适。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验