Ratnaweera Priyadarshanee Manorika, Nikaido Toru, Weerasinghe Dinesh, Wettasinghe Kamal Anuradha, Miura Hiroyuki, Tagami Junji
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Tsurumi University School of Dentistry, 2-1-3, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Japan.
Dent Mater J. 2007 May;26(3):355-60. doi: 10.4012/dmj.26.355.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strengths of two all-in-one adhesive systems to unground fluorosed enamel. Buccal surfaces of 24 normal and 24 moderately fluorosed teeth (Thylstrup and Fejerskov index, TFI=4-6) were bonded using G-Bond and Clearfil Tri-S Bond. The surfaces were then restored with a resin composite, stored for 24 hours in water, and tested for micro-shear bond strength (MSBS). Fracture modes, etching patterns, and adhesive interfaces were studied under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA, whereby no significant differences in MSBS were found among the four groups (p>0.05). Through SEM examination, it was shown that 1 microm of resin tag-like extensions had penetrated into the enamel for both adhesives at the enamel-adhesive interface. Based on the results obtained, it was concluded that MSBS was not influenced by the severity of fluorosis. Furthermore, there were no differences in enamel bond strength between G-Bond and Clearfil Tri-S Bond.
本研究的目的是评估两种一体化粘结系统与未打磨的氟斑牙釉质之间的微剪切粘结强度。使用G-Bond和Clearfil Tri-S Bond对24颗正常牙齿和24颗中度氟斑牙(Thylstrup和Fejerskov指数,TFI = 4 - 6)的颊面进行粘结。然后用树脂复合材料修复表面,在水中储存24小时,并测试微剪切粘结强度(MSBS)。在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下研究断裂模式、蚀刻图案和粘结界面。数据采用双向方差分析,结果发现四组之间的MSBS无显著差异(p>0.05)。通过SEM检查发现,两种粘结剂在釉质-粘结剂界面处均有1微米的树脂标签样延伸物渗入釉质。根据获得的结果得出结论,MSBS不受氟斑牙严重程度的影响。此外,G-Bond和Clearfil Tri-S Bond之间的釉质粘结强度没有差异。