McGlinchey Joseph B, Zimmerman Mark
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Aug;116(3):464-74. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.3.464.
The current study replicated, in a sample of 2,300 outpatients seeking psychiatric treatment, a previous study (R. F. Krueger & M. S. Finger, 2001) that implemented an item response theory approach for modeling the comorbidity of common mood and anxiety disorders as indicators along the continuum of a shared latent factor (internalizing). The 5 disorders examined were major depressive disorder, social phobia, panic disorder/agoraphobia, specific phobia, and generalized anxiety disorder. The findings were consistent with the prior research. First, a confirmatory factor analysis yielded sufficient evidence for a nonspecific factor underlying the 5 diagnostic indicators. Second, a 2-parameter logistic item response model showed that the diagnoses were represented in the upper half of the internalizing continuum, and each was a strongly discriminating indicator of the factor. Third, the internalizing factor was significantly associated with 3 indexes of social burden: poorer social functioning, time missed from work, and lifetime hospitalizations. Rather than the categorical system of presumably discrete disorders presented in DSM-IV, these 5 mood and anxiety disorders may be alternatively viewed as higher end indicators of a common factor associated with social cost.
本研究在2300名寻求精神治疗的门诊患者样本中重复了先前的一项研究(R.F.克鲁格和M.S.芬格,2001年),该研究采用项目反应理论方法,将常见情绪和焦虑障碍的共病作为共享潜在因子(内化)连续体上的指标进行建模。所考察的5种障碍为重度抑郁症、社交恐惧症、惊恐障碍/广场恐惧症、特定恐惧症和广泛性焦虑障碍。研究结果与先前的研究一致。首先,验证性因素分析为5种诊断指标背后的非特异性因素提供了充分证据。其次,二参数逻辑项目反应模型表明,这些诊断集中在内化连续体的上半部分,并且每种诊断都是该因子的强区分指标。第三,内化因子与社会负担的3个指标显著相关:社会功能较差、工作缺勤时间和终身住院次数。这5种情绪和焦虑障碍或许不应被视为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中呈现的那种假定离散障碍的分类系统,而可被视为与社会成本相关的一个共同因子的高端指标。