Suppr超能文献

神经质作为内化障碍的共同维度。

Neuroticism as a common dimension in the internalizing disorders.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2010 Jul;40(7):1125-36. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991449. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several theories have posited a common internalizing factor to help account for the relationship between mood and anxiety disorders. These disorders are often co-morbid and strongly covary. Other theories and data suggest that personality traits may account, at least in part, for co-morbidity between depression and anxiety. The present study examined the relationship between neuroticism and an internalizing dimension common to mood and anxiety disorders.

METHOD

A sample of ethnically diverse adolescents (n=621) completed self-report and peer-report measures of neuroticism. Participants also completed the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID).

RESULTS

Structural equation modeling showed that a single internalizing factor was common to lifetime diagnosis of mood and anxiety disorders, and this internalizing factor was strongly correlated with neuroticism. Neuroticism had a stronger correlation with an internalizing factor (r=0.98) than with a substance use factor (r=0.29). Therefore, neuroticism showed both convergent and discriminant validity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide further evidence that neuroticism is a necessary factor in structural theories of mood and anxiety disorders. In this study, the correlation between internalizing psychopathology and neuroticism approached 1.0, suggesting that neuroticism may be the core of internalizing psychopathology. Future studies are needed to examine this possibility in other populations, and to replicate our findings.

摘要

背景

有几种理论提出了一个共同的内在因素,以帮助解释情绪和焦虑障碍之间的关系。这些疾病通常是共病的,并且强烈相关。其他理论和数据表明,人格特质至少可以部分解释抑郁和焦虑之间的共病。本研究探讨了神经质与情绪和焦虑障碍共有的内在维度之间的关系。

方法

一组种族多样化的青少年(n=621)完成了神经质的自我报告和同伴报告测量。参与者还完成了 DSM-IV 结构化临床访谈(SCID)。

结果

结构方程模型表明,一种单一的内在因素是终生诊断的情绪和焦虑障碍的共同因素,这个内在因素与神经质密切相关。神经质与内在因素的相关性更强(r=0.98),而与物质使用因素的相关性较弱(r=0.29)。因此,神经质表现出了收敛和区别效度。

结论

这些结果进一步证明了神经质是情绪和焦虑障碍结构理论的必要因素。在这项研究中,内在病理与神经质之间的相关性接近 1.0,这表明神经质可能是内在病理的核心。未来的研究需要在其他人群中检验这种可能性,并复制我们的发现。

相似文献

1
Neuroticism as a common dimension in the internalizing disorders.神经质作为内化障碍的共同维度。
Psychol Med. 2010 Jul;40(7):1125-36. doi: 10.1017/S0033291709991449. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
The development of alcohol use disorders.酒精使用障碍的发展
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:493-523. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144107.
7
Personality traits and anxiety symptoms: the multilevel trait predictor model.人格特质与焦虑症状:多层次特质预测模型
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Jul;45(7):1485-503. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.011. Epub 2007 Jan 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验