Hickman M, Hope V, Brady T, Madden P, Jones S, Honor S, Holloway G, Ncube F, Parry J
Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J Viral Hepat. 2007 Sep;14(9):645-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2007.00855.x.
We sought to corroborate geographical differences in hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence and assess whether these can be explained by differences in injecting risk behaviour. A community recruited interview survey of 1058 injecting drug users (IDU) - including a blood spot specimen for antibody testing - was undertaken in seven cities in England. HCV prevalence varied from 27% to 74% across sites (chi(2)(6) = 115.3, P < 0.001). There was a significant variation in crack-injection, prison history, injecting frequency, homelessness, groin injecting, syringe reuse and sharing between the sites. Adjustment for clustering by site and other covariates attenuated the odds ratios (OR) for most variables: e.g. crack injection changed from an unadjusted OR of >2 to an adjusted OR of 1.4 (95% CI 0.9-2.0). Remaining significant covariates included: homelessness (OR 2.2; 1.4-3.6); ever imprisonment (OR 1.7; 1.2-2.5); syringe sharing >18 months ago (OR 2.0; 1.3-3.0); injecting duration and age. Introducing site as a second level variable did not reach significance (P = 0.10). HCV prevalence among IDU reporting 'never sharing' was 48%. Geographical variation in HCV prevalence remains poorly explained, but should be the key focus of our surveillance effort. Measures of sharing and their interpretation require greater scrutiny.
我们试图证实丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)流行率的地域差异,并评估这些差异是否可以通过注射风险行为的差异来解释。在英格兰的七个城市对1058名注射吸毒者(IDU)进行了一项社区招募的访谈调查,包括采集血斑样本进行抗体检测。各地点的HCV流行率从27%到74%不等(χ²(6)=115.3,P<0.001)。各地点在吸食强效可卡因注射、有入狱史、注射频率、无家可归、腹股沟注射、重复使用和共用注射器方面存在显著差异。对地点聚类和其他协变量进行调整后,大多数变量的优势比(OR)有所降低:例如,吸食强效可卡因注射的未调整OR值>2,调整后的OR值为1.4(95%CI 0.9-2.0)。其余显著的协变量包括:无家可归(OR 2.2;1.4-3.6);曾入狱(OR 1.7;1.2-2.5);18个月前共用注射器(OR 2.0;1.3-3.0);注射持续时间和年龄。将地点作为二级变量引入未达到显著水平(P=0.10)。报告“从不共用”的注射吸毒者中HCV流行率为48%。HCV流行率的地域差异仍难以解释,但应是我们监测工作的重点。共用措施及其解释需要更严格的审查。