Suppr超能文献

笔式注射器的长期疗效。

Long term efficacy of a pen injector.

作者信息

Dinneen S F, Cronin C C, O'Sullivan D J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cork Regional Hospital, Wilton.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 1991 Sep;160(9):286-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02948414.

Abstract

We assessed the long term efficacy of Novopen as a form of insulin administration. Records were obtained on 48 patients who were treated with Novopen between January '86 and October '88. Six patients were excluded due to insufficient data. The study group of 42 patients comprised 22 females and 20 males of average age 33 years (range 17-66). Mean Hb.A1 rose from 10.6% to 12.1% after Novopen therapy, a rise of 14.1%. This rise is both clinically and statistically significant (p less than 0.001; 99% confidence limits 0.59-2.78). Increases in weight and insulin dose were also noted, but did not reach statistical significance. The majority of patients felt Novopen was superior to twice daily insulin in terms of ease of administration (81%) and flexibility of lifestyle (95%), and all who were using Novopen wished to continue with it. More than 50% of patients admitted to altering their dietary habits while using Novopen. Despite continuing patient satisfaction with this form of insulin administration, its long-term use may be associated with sub-optimal metabolic control.

摘要

我们评估了诺和笔作为一种胰岛素给药方式的长期疗效。收集了1986年1月至1988年10月期间接受诺和笔治疗的48例患者的记录。6例患者因数据不足被排除。研究组的42例患者包括22名女性和20名男性,平均年龄33岁(范围17 - 66岁)。诺和笔治疗后,平均糖化血红蛋白(Hb.A1)从10.6%升至12.1%,上升了14.1%。这一上升在临床和统计学上均具有显著性(p小于0.001;99%置信区间为0.59 - 2.78)。体重和胰岛素剂量也有所增加,但未达到统计学显著性。大多数患者认为诺和笔在给药便利性(81%)和生活方式灵活性(95%)方面优于每日两次注射胰岛素,所有使用诺和笔的患者都希望继续使用。超过50%的患者承认在使用诺和笔期间改变了饮食习惯。尽管患者对这种胰岛素给药方式持续满意,但其长期使用可能与代谢控制欠佳有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验