• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进女性骑行:自行车基础设施的作用。

Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure.

作者信息

Garrard Jan, Rose Geoffrey, Lo Sing Kai

机构信息

School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2008 Jan;46(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.010
PMID:17698185
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Females are substantially less likely than males to cycle for transport in countries with low bicycle transport mode share. We investigated whether female commuter cyclists were more likely to use bicycle routes that provide separation from motor vehicle traffic.

METHODS

Census of cyclists observed at 15 locations (including off-road bicycle paths, on-road lanes and roads with no bicycle facilities) within a 7.4 km radius of the central business district (CBD) of Melbourne, Australia, during peak commuting times in February 2004.

RESULTS

6589 cyclists were observed, comprising 5229 males (79.4%) and 1360 females (20.6%). After adjustment for distance of the bicycle facility from the CBD, females showed a preference for using off-road paths rather than roads with no bicycle facilities (odds ratio [OR]=1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12, 1.83), or roads with on-road bicycle lanes (OR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with gender differences in risk aversion, female commuter cyclists preferred to use routes with maximum separation from motorized traffic. Improved cycling infrastructure in the form of bicycle paths and lanes that provide a high degree of separation from motor traffic is likely to be important for increasing transportation cycling amongst under-represented population groups such as women.

摘要

目的

在自行车出行方式占比低的国家,女性骑车通勤的可能性远低于男性。我们调查了女性通勤骑车者是否更有可能使用与机动车交通分隔的自行车道。

方法

2004年2月高峰通勤时段,在澳大利亚墨尔本中央商务区(CBD)半径7.4公里范围内的15个地点(包括越野自行车道、道路上的自行车道和没有自行车设施的道路)对骑车者进行普查。

结果

共观察到6589名骑车者,其中男性5229名(79.4%),女性1360名(20.6%)。在对自行车设施距中央商务区的距离进行调整后,女性更倾向于使用越野路径,而不是没有自行车设施的道路(优势比[OR]=1.43,95%置信区间[CI]:1.12,1.83),或有道路自行车道的道路(OR=1.34,95%CI:1.03,1.75)。

结论

与风险规避方面的性别差异一致,女性通勤骑车者更喜欢使用与机动车交通最大限度分隔的路线。以自行车道和自行车路径形式存在的、与机动车交通高度分隔的改善后的自行车基础设施,对于增加女性等代表性不足人群的交通骑行可能很重要。

相似文献

1
Promoting transportation cycling for women: the role of bicycle infrastructure.促进女性骑行:自行车基础设施的作用。
Prev Med. 2008 Jan;46(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Jul 17.
2
Bicycling for transportation and health: the role of infrastructure.骑自行车用于出行与健康:基础设施的作用。
J Public Health Policy. 2009;30 Suppl 1:S95-110. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2008.56.
3
Bicycle crashes in different riding environments in the Australian capital territory.澳大利亚首都地区不同骑行环境下的自行车事故。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(1):81-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.781591.
4
Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with cycling for transport among a working population.与在职人群中骑车通勤相关的社会心理和环境因素。
Health Educ Res. 2008 Aug;23(4):697-708. doi: 10.1093/her/cym055. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
5
How much space do drivers provide when passing cyclists? Understanding the impact of motor vehicle and infrastructure characteristics on passing distance.司机在超越自行车时会留出多大的空间?了解机动车和基础设施特征对超越距离的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Cyclists' attitudes toward policies encouraging bicycle travel: findings from the Taupo Bicycle Study in New Zealand.新西兰陶波自行车研究:鼓励自行车出行政策下的自行车骑行者态度。
Health Promot Int. 2010 Mar;25(1):54-62. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dap041. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
7
Key influences on motivations for utility cycling (cycling for transport to and from places).影响实用骑行动机(即骑车往返于各地点的出行目的)的主要因素。
Health Promot J Austr. 2013 Dec;24(3):227-33. doi: 10.1071/HE13062.
8
Are bicycle lanes effective? The relationship between passing distance and road characteristics.自行车道是否有效?超越距离与道路特征的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106184. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106184. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
9
The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: a review of the literature.交通基础设施对自行车事故和碰撞的影响:文献综述。
Environ Health. 2009 Oct 21;8:47. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-8-47.
10
The effect of cycle lanes on the proximity between motor traffic and cycle traffic.自行车道对机动车和自行车交通接近程度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jan;42(1):159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.018. Epub 2009 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cycling infrastructure as a determinant of cycling for recreation and transportation in Montréal, Canada: a natural experiment using the longitudinal national population health survey.加拿大蒙特利尔市自行车基础设施对休闲及通勤骑行的影响:基于全国纵向人口健康调查的自然实验
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Jun 10;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01767-y.
2
Economic Implications of Off-Road Cycle Lanes to Increase Physical Activity and Reduce Sex and Gender Differences in the Risk of Dementia.越野自行车道对增加身体活动及减少痴呆症风险中的性别差异的经济影响。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;40(3):e70067. doi: 10.1002/gps.70067.
3
Case-control study of fatal bicycle crashes in peri-urban areas of Delhi.
德里周边地区致命自行车事故的病例对照研究。
Inj Prev. 2024 Oct 24. doi: 10.1136/ip-2024-045262.
4
Building CapaCITY/É for sustainable transportation: protocol for an implementation science research program in healthy cities.建设有能力的城市/É 以实现可持续交通:健康城市实施科学研究计划的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 17;14(4):e085850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085850.
5
''I felt marvellous e-cycling. If I had long hair I would have flicked it": a qualitative investigation of the factors associated with e-cycling engagement among adults with type 2 diabetes.“我骑电动自行车感觉棒极了。要是我有长发,肯定会甩动起来”:对 2 型糖尿病成年人电动自行车骑行参与度相关因素的定性研究
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Sep 29;5:1150724. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1150724. eCollection 2023.
6
Changes in public bike usage after the COVID-19 outbreak: A survey of Seoul public bike sharing users.新冠疫情爆发后公共自行车使用情况的变化:一项对首尔公共自行车共享用户的调查。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Sep;96:104716. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104716. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
7
Equity impacts of cycling investment in England: A natural experimental study using longitudinally linked individual-level Census data.英国自行车投资的公平性影响:一项使用纵向关联的个人层面人口普查数据的自然实验研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jun 1;23:101438. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101438. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Gender differences in active travel in major cities across the world.世界各地主要城市中主动出行的性别差异。
Transportation (Amst). 2023 Apr;50(2):733-749. doi: 10.1007/s11116-021-10259-4. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
9
Using machine learning models to predict the willingness to carry lightweight goods by bike and kick-scooter.使用机器学习模型预测骑自行车和踏板车携带轻量级物品的意愿。
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2022 Mar;13:100568. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100568. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
10
Discovering spatiotemporal usage patterns of a bike-sharing system by type of pass: a case study from Seoul.按通行证类型发现共享单车系统的时空使用模式:以首尔为例的研究
Transportation (Amst). 2023 Feb 21:1-35. doi: 10.1007/s11116-023-10371-7.