Chrysostomou Anastasia, Pedagogos Eugenia, MacGregor Lachlan, Becker Gavin J
Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Mar;1(2):256-62. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01040905. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
Studies have shown that dual therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and either angiotensin II receptor blockers or aldosterone receptor antagonists is more effective in reducing proteinuria than either agent used alone. The questions that remain are as follows: (1) Which of these agents should be used as dual therapy with the ACEI? (2) Does a higher level of blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system with triple therapy offer an advantage over dual blockade? A 3-mo randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 41 patients with proteinuria >1.5 g/d. Four treatment groups were compared: (1) Ramipril + spironolactone placebo + irbesartan placebo, (2) ramipril + irbesartan + spironolactone placebo, (3) ramipril + irbesartan placebo + spironolactone, and (4) ramipril + irbesartan + spironolactone. The percentage change in protein excretion differed according to treatment arm (ANOVA: F(3,35) = 8.6, P < 0.001). Pair-wise comparison showed that greater reduction in protein excretion occurred in treatment regimens that incorporated spironolactone. The reduction in proteinuria at 3 mo was as follows: Group 1, 1.4%; group 2, 15.7%; group 3, 42.0%; and group 4, 48.2%. The reduction in proteinuria among patients who were taking spironolactone-containing regimens was sustained at 6 and 12 mo. This study suggests that aldosterone receptor blockade offers a valuable adjuvant treatment when used with ACEI therapy for the reduction of proteinuria. Results suggest no advantage of triple blockade over dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to reduce proteinuria.
研究表明,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)与血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂或醛固酮受体拮抗剂联合治疗在降低蛋白尿方面比单独使用任何一种药物都更有效。仍然存在的问题如下:(1)这些药物中哪一种应与ACEI联合用于双重治疗?(2)三联疗法对肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统的更高水平阻断是否比双重阻断更具优势?对41例蛋白尿>1.5 g/d的患者进行了一项为期3个月的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。比较了四个治疗组:(1)雷米普利+螺内酯安慰剂+厄贝沙坦安慰剂,(2)雷米普利+厄贝沙坦+螺内酯安慰剂,(3)雷米普利+厄贝沙坦安慰剂+螺内酯,以及(4)雷米普利+厄贝沙坦+螺内酯。各治疗组的蛋白质排泄百分比变化不同(方差分析:F(3,35)=8.6,P<0.001)。两两比较显示,在包含螺内酯的治疗方案中,蛋白质排泄减少得更多。3个月时蛋白尿的降低情况如下:第1组,1.4%;第2组,15.7%;第3组,42.0%;第组,48.2%。服用含螺内酯方案的患者蛋白尿的降低在6个月和12个月时持续存在。这项研究表明,醛固酮受体阻断与ACEI治疗联合使用以降低蛋白尿时是一种有价值的辅助治疗。结果表明,在降低蛋白尿方面,肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统的三联阻断并不比双重阻断更具优势。