Heudorf U
Stadtgesundheitsamt Frankfurt, Abteilung Medizinische Dienste und Hygiene, Frankfurt.
Gesundheitswesen. 2007 Jul;69(7):408-14. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-985133.
In Germany, some schools have already been built according to the passive-house standard as an answer to the discussion of climate change and energy saving. For European passive construction, a prerequisite is an annual heating requirement of less than 15 kWh/(m2a) (4755 Btu/ft2/yr). Efficient heat recovery from exhaust air using an air-to-air heat exchanger reduces energy consumption and is considered to improve indoor air quality as well. However, data on indoor air quality have been lacking up to now. Here, the data on indoor air quality in a passive house school are presented.
In the passive-house school in Frankfurt/M in summer time ventilation is performed by opening the windows. In winter time a mechanical ventilation system provides air at 14-16 m3/person h, with the incoming air being heated by an air-to-air heat exchanger. CO2 levels were obtained during 3 school days in one classroom in summer time, and during 5 days in two classrooms in winter time. In 5-minute intervals a continuous documentation of the number of persons present in the room, their activity and ventilation was done parallel to the measurements.
Mean CO2 levels in summer time were 1127 ppm, and 946 ppm in winter time. Regarding only those measurements with people present in the classroom, the air quality standard of 1000 ppm (Pettenkofer's level) was exceeded in two thirds of the measurements in summer and in winter, with 5% (summer) and 10% (winter) of the levels exceeding the guideline value (DIN 1946) of 1500 ppm. Considering the guideline values of the "new" DIN EN 13779, 9-21% of the measurements exceeded 1400 ppm, i.e., "low air quality".
Mean CO2 levels in the passive-house school were comparable to those in conventionally ventilated schools, i.e., ventilation via opening the windows, whereas maximal levels were lower in the passive-house school than in other schools. The guideline value of 1500 ppm was exceeded on 33% of the measurement days, the level of 1400 ppm was exceeded in 92% of the days. According to these data, indoor air quality should be improved not only in conventionally ventilated schools but also in passive-house schools. In addition to the mechanical ventilation, ventilation by opening the windows during breaks is necessary. Therefore, sufficient capacity for opening the windows should be available. This is mandatory not only for summer time ventilation but also in case of problems with the mechanical ventilation system. As a result air quality should be an important issue in passive houses as well, in addition to the focus on energy saving.
在德国,一些学校已经按照被动式房屋标准建造,以回应气候变化和节能的讨论。对于欧洲的被动式建筑,一个前提条件是年供暖需求低于15千瓦时/(平方米·年)(4755英热单位/平方英尺/年)。使用空气-空气热交换器从废气中高效回收热量可降低能源消耗,并且也被认为能改善室内空气质量。然而,到目前为止一直缺乏室内空气质量的数据。在此,呈现了一所被动式房屋学校的室内空气质量数据。
在法兰克福/美因河畔的被动式房屋学校,夏季通过开窗进行通风。冬季,机械通风系统以每人每小时14 - 16立方米的量提供空气,进入的空气由空气-空气热交换器加热。在夏季的一个教室记录了3个教学日的二氧化碳水平,在冬季的两个教室记录了5天的二氧化碳水平。在测量的同时,每隔5分钟持续记录房间内的人数、他们的活动以及通风情况。
夏季的平均二氧化碳水平为1127 ppm,冬季为946 ppm。仅考虑教室有人时的测量结果,夏季和冬季三分之二的测量中空气质量标准1000 ppm(佩滕科费尔水平)被超过,其中5%(夏季)和10%(冬季)的水平超过了1500 ppm的指导值(DIN 1946)。考虑“新”的DIN EN 13779的指导值,9 - 21%的测量超过了1400 ppm,即“低空气质量”。
被动式房屋学校的平均二氧化碳水平与传统通风学校(即通过开窗通风的学校)相当,而被动式房屋学校的最高水平低于其他学校。在33%的测量日超过了1500 ppm的指导值,在92%的日子超过了1400 ppm的水平。根据这些数据,不仅传统通风学校的室内空气质量需要改善,被动式房屋学校的也需要改善。除了机械通风外,课间开窗通风也是必要的。因此,应该有足够的开窗能力。这不仅在夏季通风时是强制性的,在机械通风系统出现问题时也是如此。因此,除了关注节能外,空气质量在被动式房屋中也应是一个重要问题。