Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术采用D1 +β与D1 +α淋巴结清扫术的比较。

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D1+beta compared with D1+alpha lymph node dissection.

作者信息

Wei Jia-Ming, Shiraishi Norio, Goto Shingo, Yasuda Kazuhiro, Inomata Masafumi, Kitano Seigo

机构信息

Surgery 1, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2008 Apr;22(4):955-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9529-9. Epub 2007 Aug 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with D1+beta lymph node dissection has become the most popular treatment for early gastric cancer in Asian countries. However, the same clinical advantages with this procedure as with LADG with D1+alpha lymph node dissection has not been shown. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of LADG with D1+beta to that of LADG with D1+alpha lymph node dissection.

METHODS

During the period June 2002 through June 2006, LADG with D1+alpha lymph node dissection was performed in 54 patients, and LADG with D1+beta lymph node dissection was performed in 42 patients. Surgical findings, clinicopathological data, postoperative course, complications, nutritional status, and blood analysis findings were compared between the two groups. Differences were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test.

RESULTS

Patients in the two groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, body mass index, and stage and pathological characteristics of gastric cancer. A significantly greater number of N2 lymph nodes were harvested by D1+beta lymph node dissection than by D1+alpha dissection (5.9 vs. 2.7, P < 0.01). However, no significances in the total number of retrieved lymph nodes (24.7 vs. 22.2) or perigastric lymph nodes dissected (18.9 vs. 19.4) were identified between the D1+beta and D1+alpha groups. There was also no significant difference between the D1+alpha and D1+beta groups with respect to operation time, blood loss, complication rate, time to first walking, first flatus, first eating, and first defecation, frequency of analgesics given, volume of food intake on postoperative day 7, weight loss, and postoperative hospital stay. Blood analysis showed there were no significant differences in white blood cell count, granulocyte count, lymphocyte count, levels of C-reactive protein, and serum albumin.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term outcome of LADG with D1+beta lymph node dissection is comparable to that of LADG with D1+alpha lymph node dissection. According to the oncological requirements, we can apply this operation as a minimally invasive surgery.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌切除术(LADG)联合D1+β淋巴结清扫术已成为亚洲国家早期胃癌最常用的治疗方法。然而,该手术与LADG联合D1+α淋巴结清扫术相比,尚未显示出相同的临床优势。本研究的目的是比较LADG联合D1+β与LADG联合D1+α淋巴结清扫术的疗效。

方法

在2002年6月至2006年6月期间,54例患者接受了LADG联合D1+α淋巴结清扫术,42例患者接受了LADG联合D1+β淋巴结清扫术。比较两组的手术发现、临床病理数据、术后病程、并发症、营养状况和血液分析结果。采用Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验分析差异。

结果

两组患者在年龄、性别、体重指数以及胃癌的分期和病理特征方面具有可比性。D1+β淋巴结清扫术获取的N2淋巴结数量明显多于D1+α清扫术(5.9对2.7,P<0.01)。然而,D1+β组和D1+α组在回收淋巴结总数(24.7对22.2)或胃周淋巴结清扫数量(18.9对19.4)方面没有显著差异。D1+α组和D

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验