López-Rosales F, González-Contreras Q, Muro L J, Berber M M, de León H T Cid, Fernández O V, Veana R R
Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga No.15 Tlalpan, CP, 14000, México.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2304-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9523-2. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
Since the introduction of laparoscopic colectomy in 1991, experience in laparoscopic bowel surgery has gradually increased. Several reports from specialized centers have demonstrated that laparoscopic colorectal resections are feasible and safe, providing an acceptable alternative to laparotomy for a variety of diseases. Some studies have shown the feasibility, safety, and good functional outcome of the minimally invasive procedures for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). No known studies have investigated laparoscopic proctocolectomy in México. This report aims to describe the first laparoscopic proctocolectomies with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) performed at the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ).
All the patients in the authors' institution who underwent a one- or two-stage laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with IPAA between June 2005 and December 2006 were included in the study. All the operations were performed by the same surgeon, who had already completed the learning curve for colorectal laparoscopic procedures.
For the study, 10 patients underwent a laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IPAA by a single surgeon. Eight of the patients underwent a one-stage procedure, whereas two patients with severe colitis underwent a two-step procedure. All the cases were managed with a diverting loop ileostomy. Six patients underwent a standard double-stapled IPAA anastomosis, and two patients with FAP underwent a mucosectomy with a manual IPAA anastomosis. The mean operative time was 187 min, and the mean blood loss was 46 ml. There were two postoperative complications. One patient presented with an early small bowel obstruction due to an internal hernia, which required reoperation. The other complication was a wound infection. The mean return to oral intake was 1.5 days, and the mean length of hospital stay was 3.4 days.
Although this was not a comparative study and although sample size imposed limitations, with this preliminary data, we conclude that the laparoscopic approach to UC and FAP at our institution is safe, feasible, and effective. However, to achieve the benefits in postoperative outcome, this procedure should be performed only by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
自1991年引入腹腔镜结肠切除术以来,腹腔镜肠道手术的经验逐渐增加。来自专业中心的几份报告表明,腹腔镜结直肠切除术是可行且安全的,为多种疾病提供了可接受的剖腹手术替代方案。一些研究显示了针对溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)的微创手术的可行性、安全性及良好的功能结局。墨西哥尚无关于腹腔镜直肠结肠切除术的已知研究。本报告旨在描述在萨尔瓦多·苏比拉án国家医学与营养科学研究所(INCMNSZ)进行的首例腹腔镜直肠结肠切除术加回肠储袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)。
本研究纳入了2005年6月至2006年12月期间在作者所在机构接受一期或二期腹腔镜全直肠结肠切除术加IPAA的所有患者。所有手术均由同一位外科医生进行,该医生已完成结直肠腹腔镜手术的学习曲线。
本研究中,10例患者由同一位外科医生进行了腹腔镜直肠结肠切除术加IPAA。8例患者接受了一期手术,而2例重症结肠炎患者接受了两步手术。所有病例均采用转流性回肠造口术处理。6例患者接受了标准的双吻合器IPAA吻合术,2例FAP患者接受了黏膜切除术加手工IPAA吻合术。平均手术时间为187分钟,平均失血量为46毫升。有2例术后并发症。1例患者因内疝出现早期小肠梗阻,需要再次手术。另一个并发症是伤口感染。平均恢复经口进食时间为1.5天,平均住院时间为3.4天。
尽管这不是一项对照研究,且样本量存在局限性,但基于这些初步数据,我们得出结论,在我们机构,腹腔镜治疗UC和FAP是安全、可行且有效的。然而,为了获得术后良好结局,该手术应由经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行。