Suppr超能文献

抗癫痫药物的精神科不良事件是一种独特的情况吗?一项关于托吡酯和左乙拉西坦的研究。

Are psychiatric adverse events of antiepileptic drugs a unique entity? A study on topiramate and levetiracetam.

作者信息

Mula Marco, Trimble Michael R, Sander Josemir W

机构信息

Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, Section of Neurology, Amedeo Avogadro University, Novara, Italy.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2007 Dec;48(12):2322-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01262.x. Epub 2007 Aug 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the hypothesis that some patients with epilepsy are generally prone to develop psychiatric adverse events (PAEs) during antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy irrespective of the mechanism of action of the drugs.

METHODS

From a large case registry of patients prescribed topiramate (TPM) and levetiracetam (LEV), data of patients who had a trial with both drugs were analyzed. Demographic and clinical variables of those who developed PAEs with both drugs (group 1) were compared with those who did not (group 2). Subsequently, from the whole case registry, psychopathological features, demographic, and clinical variables of patients developing PAEs with TPM were compared with those of patients developing PAEs with LEV.

RESULTS

The case registry included over 800 patients. Among 108 patients having a trial with both drugs, we identified 9 patients in group 1 and 71 in group 2. Previous psychiatric history, family psychiatric history and history of febrile convulsions showed to be significant clinical correlates. Comparing patients who developed PAEs with LEV with those who developed PAEs with TPM, there were no differences in epilepsy related variables. Well-defined DSM-IV disorders were more frequent with TPM than with LEV. Seizure freedom was associated with psychosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that a subgroup of patients is generally prone to develop PAEs during AED therapy, despite different pharmacological properties of the AEDs. A particular clinical profile and relevant variables have been identified.

摘要

目的

研究一种假设,即一些癫痫患者在抗癫痫药物(AED)治疗期间普遍易于出现精神科不良事件(PAE),而不论药物的作用机制如何。

方法

从一个大量使用托吡酯(TPM)和左乙拉西坦(LEV)的患者病例登记处,分析了同时试用这两种药物的患者数据。将两种药物均出现PAE的患者(第1组)的人口统计学和临床变量与未出现PAE的患者(第2组)进行比较。随后,从整个病例登记处,将出现TPM相关PAE的患者与出现LEV相关PAE的患者的精神病理学特征、人口统计学和临床变量进行比较。

结果

病例登记处包括800多名患者。在108名同时试用这两种药物的患者中,我们确定第1组有9名患者,第2组有71名患者。既往精神病史、家族精神病史和热性惊厥史显示为显著的临床相关因素。将出现LEV相关PAE的患者与出现TPM相关PAE的患者进行比较,癫痫相关变量没有差异。明确的DSM-IV障碍在TPM组比在LEV组更常见。癫痫发作缓解与精神病相关。

结论

本研究表明,尽管AEDs具有不同的药理学特性,但有一个亚组患者在AED治疗期间普遍易于出现PAE。已确定了一种特定的临床特征和相关变量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验