Suppr超能文献

精神科副作用与抗癫痫药物:前瞻性审计观察结果

Psychiatric side effects and antiepileptic drugs: Observations from prospective audits.

作者信息

Stephen Linda J, Wishart Abbie, Brodie Martin J

机构信息

Epilepsy Unit, West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, Scotland, UK.

Epilepsy Unit, West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Jun;71(Pt A):73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

Psychiatric comorbidities are common in people with epilepsy. A retrospective study of characteristics associated with withdrawal due to psychiatric side effects was undertaken in patients with treated epilepsy participating in prospective audits with new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A total of 1058 treated patients with uncontrolled seizures (942 focal-onset seizures, 116 generalized genetic epilepsies [GGEs]) participated in eight prospective, observational audits from 1996 to 2014. These patients were prescribed adjunctive topiramate (n=170), levetiracetam (n=220), pregabalin (n=135), zonisamide (n=203), lacosamide (n=160), eslicarbazepine acetate (n=52), retigabine (n=64), or perampanel (n=54). Doses were titrated according to efficacy and tolerability to optimize zeizure outcomes and reduce side effects. Psychiatric comorbidities were recorded prior to and after the addition of each AED. At baseline, patients with focal-onset seizures (189 of 942; 20.1%) were statistically more likely to have psychiatric diagnoses compared to patients with GGEs (14 of 116, 12.1%; p=0.039). Following adjunctive AED treatment, neuropsychiatric adverse effects led to AED withdrawal in 1.9-16.7% of patients. Patients with a pre-treatment psychiatric history (22 of 209; 10.5%) were statistically more likely to discontinue their new AED due to psychiatric issues compared to patients with no previous psychiatric diagnosis (50 of 849; 5.9%; p=0.017). Patients receiving sodium channel blocking AEDs (4 of 212, 1.9%) were statistically less likely to develop intolerable psychiatric problems, compared to those on AEDs possessing other mechanisms of action (68 of 846, 8.0%; p=0.012). Depression was the commonest problem, leading to discontinuation of AEDs in 2.8% (n=30) patients. Aggression was statistically more common in men (11 of 527, 2.1%) compared to women (1 of 531, 0.2%; p=0.004). Patients with learning disability (12 of 122, 9.8%; p=0.0015) were statistically less likely to have psychiatric issues prior to adjunctive AED treatment compared to other patients (208 of 936, 22.2%), but there were no statistically significant differences once the new AEDs were added (8 of 122 patients with learning disability, 6.6%; 64 of 936 other patients, 6.8%). Awareness of these issues may assist clinicians in avoiding, identifying and treating psychiatric comorbidities in people with epilepsy.

摘要

精神疾病共病在癫痫患者中很常见。对参与新型抗癫痫药物(AEDs)前瞻性审核的接受治疗的癫痫患者进行了一项回顾性研究,以探讨因精神副作用而停药的相关特征。1996年至2014年期间,共有1058例癫痫控制不佳的患者(942例局灶性发作,116例全身性遗传性癫痫[GGEs])参与了8项前瞻性观察性审核。这些患者被处方了辅助性托吡酯(n = 170)、左乙拉西坦(n = 220)、普瑞巴林(n = 135)、唑尼沙胺(n = 203)、拉科酰胺(n = 160)、醋酸艾司利卡西平(n = 52)、瑞替加滨(n = 64)或吡仑帕奈(n = 54)。根据疗效和耐受性调整剂量,以优化癫痫发作结果并减少副作用。在添加每种AED之前和之后记录精神疾病共病情况。在基线时,与GGEs患者(116例中的14例,12.1%;p = 0.039)相比,局灶性发作患者(942例中的189例,20.1%)在统计学上更有可能有精神疾病诊断。辅助性AED治疗后,神经精神不良反应导致1.9% - 16.7%的患者停用AED。与无既往精神疾病诊断的患者(849例中的50例,5.9%;p = 0.017)相比,有治疗前精神病史的患者(209例中的22例,10.5%)在统计学上更有可能因精神问题停用新的AED。与使用具有其他作用机制的AEDs的患者(846例中的68例,8.0%;p = 0.012)相比,接受钠通道阻滞AEDs的患者(212例中的4例,1.9%)在统计学上发生无法耐受的精神问题的可能性较小。抑郁是最常见的问题,导致2.8%(n = 30)的患者停用AED。在统计学上,男性(527例中的11例,2.1%)的攻击性比女性(531例中的1例,0.2%;p = 0.004)更常见。与其他患者(9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验