Kelman Ilan
National Center for Atmospheric Research, 3450 Mitchell Lane, Boulder, CO 80301, USA.
Disasters. 2007 Sep;31(3):288-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01010.x.
Hurricane Katrina struck the United States at the end of August 2005. The consequent devastation appeared to be beyond the US government's ability to cope with and aid was offered by several states in varying degrees of conflict with the US. Hurricane Katrina therefore became a potential case study for 'disaster diplomacy', which examines how disaster-related activities do and do not yield diplomatic gains. A review of past disaster diplomacy work is provided. The literature's case studies are then categorised using a new typology: propinquity, aid relationship, level and purpose. Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath are then placed in the context of the US government's foreign policy, the international response to the disaster and the US government's reaction to these responses. The evidence presented is used to discuss the potential implications of Hurricane Katrina disaster diplomacy, indicating that factors other than disaster-related activities generally dominate diplomatic relations and foreign policy.
2005年8月底,卡特里娜飓风袭击了美国。随之而来的破坏似乎超出了美国政府的应对能力,一些与美国存在不同程度冲突的州提供了援助。因此,卡特里娜飓风成为了“灾难外交”的一个潜在案例研究,该研究探讨与灾难相关的活动如何以及是否能带来外交收益。本文回顾了以往的灾难外交工作。然后,利用一种新的类型学对文献中的案例研究进行分类:临近性、援助关系、级别和目的。接着,将卡特里娜飓风及其后果置于美国政府外交政策、国际社会对该灾难的反应以及美国政府对这些反应的回应的背景下进行考量。所呈现的证据用于讨论卡特里娜飓风灾难外交的潜在影响,表明通常是与灾难相关活动以外的因素主导着外交关系和外交政策。